Ethogram Theory is the only way to understand personal phenomenological time and space as part(s) of major concepts * -- because, at its base, this theory relies on the Memories AS THEY ARE (including visual-spacial memory, as a BIG one).
(All this unfolding with ontogeny, of course, and innately guided.)
SEE: https://www.researchgate.net/project/Human-Ethology-and-Development-Ethogram-Theory
Is anything else (that does not do this) even remotely acceptable?
* FOOTNOTE: as and when needed
P.S. Hey, dualists: we gotcha. How else are YOU going to realistically get time and space into concepts?: Step 1, for you : Realize that (by definition) the Memories (types of memory, now well-studied) ARE EXPERIENCE ITSELF (thus always part of 'the' here-and-now). If Memories were something else, or separate, then what is/would be time and space [ in individuals' concepts ] ? (Forget anything just sensori-motor-based OR raw "brain activity" without intimate external referents [(think especially of abstract concepts working across many circumstances, thanks in good part to the Memories providing a lot of context)] . Modern psychologists' 'ideas' of 'evolution' are NOTWITHSTANDING. So, finally has a primary fatal stupidity of yours been identified (and "nailed")?)
Particularly with respect to General AI: There are indications that the Red Chinese may well be taking more interest in Ethogram Theory than others. (I thought I should make note of this.)
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Theoretical Physics
- Time