Dear Elio Battista, NASAs account of the magnetic interaction with the Earth shows that the thrust is not due to this interaction. This result was totally ignored later by Martin Tajmar and his team when they attacked NASA.
See: Article Measurement of Impulsive Thrust from a Closed Radio-Frequenc...
and refer to "8. Error Sources", see paragraph 3:
The third error is magnetic interaction, which has the potential for a false positive resulting from dc currents in power cables interacting during test article operation with ambient magnetic fields (e.g., local Earth field, magnetic damper) to generate a torque displacement on the pendulum. All dc power cables are a twisted pair or twisted shielded pair to minimize magnetic interaction. The test article is tested in forward, reverse, and null thrust orientations, but dc power cable routing and orientation is the same for all three configurations (power cables come in from the top of the test article), meaning any false positives will be the same magnitude and polarity for all three tests. This is not observed during the test campaign. Sincerely, Eytan Suchard, [email protected]
Dear Eytan,
Thank you for enjoying my research.
The interaction with the magnetic field of the earth is really extremely weak as showed in my article "On the Anomalous Forces in Microwave Cavity-Magnetron Systems". We can download it freely (Open Access) in the follow website: https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/joe.2019.0011
The magnetic interaction with the earth cannot explain the magnitude of the anomalous force measured.
In case of EM Drive with magnetron, there is an interaction related to charge carriers. In case of EM Drive with dielectric, there is an interaction related to electric dipoles.
Best Regards,
Elio
Thank you. Well known to me. Thank you. Actually M_virtual = Q / sqrt(16 Pi G Epsilon0) that means gravity for positive charge and antigravity for negative. The electric field itself is energy and it generates gravity in the classical limit.
You can also see my paper: Article Electro-Gravity Via Geometric Chronon Field
This totally rewrites (35) and Appendix B in an older IOPScience paper. Appendix B is no longer an appendix. A more advanced paper has the exact Fine Structure Constant from electro-gravity.
Kind regards,
Eytan
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Psychology
- Attitude