Hi,
I am trying to come up with a methodology to better understand how effective are SETs at evaluating faculty performance in the classroom?
I was thinking about a design in which a faculty member rates themselves using the SETs tool that students use to evaluate the course; having their dean fill out an evaluation and see if there is a correlation between the means of student, faculty, and dean SETs scores.
My question first question is: Would I be able to get access to student mean scores and qualitative data for each SETs question for a particular course at the end of the semester?
My second question is: How else can I test how effective SETs are at evaluating faculty performance in the classroom?
I hope that this suggestion may be helpful but you may find that using a declarative mapping sentence is useful in structuring and understanding the effects of the various variables in your design.
I quite did not understand what do you mean by SETs? Perhaps if you could describe what does it stand for in your question to get more relevant answers from subject experts here.
However, regarding the access to students mean scores (quantitative data) and qualitative data, I don't think this would be a problem if you are conducting your research as an MSc or PhD student. All you need is to consult with your research supervisor or advisor and fill out the research ethics applications in which you need to describe how you intend to collect, process, analyze and publish your data.
Very good luck!
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Methodology