I have often seen the excellent micrographs of using Barker's reagent (2% HBF4) to anodize etch metallographically polished aluminium alloy samples.

I am specifically concerned with the extreme health risks associated with possible formation of HF, a well known deadly acid that should be treated with the utmost respect and calcium gluconate gel should be available incase there is skin contact.

To clarify, my lab does not allow such dangerous HF etchant to be used and hence I seek to confirm if Barker's is indeed much safer!

I am aware that strong HBF4 needs calcium gluconate gel (https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/GB/en/sds/sigald/207934 and https://www.ilo.org/dyn/icsc/showcard.display?p_version=2&p_card_id=1040), I believe this relates to the formation of HF through hydrolysis reaction (Article Hydrolysis of Fluoboric Acid in Aqueous Solution

).

Yet, some MSDS for strong HBF4 do not stipulate the need for calcium gluconate gel (https://www.fishersci.com/store/msds?partNumber=A188500&productDescription=FLUOBORIC+AC+48-50%25+P+500ML&vendorId=VN00033897&countryCode=US&language=en).

While MSDS specifically for Barker's also does not raise any need for calcium gluconate gel in the event of skin contact (http://nebula.wsimg.com/845f81c1a8e5c887672140d4378de4b6?AccessKeyId=628C908180FB63374807&disposition=0&alloworigin=1).

If anyone can clarify my safety concerns with Barker's and may lead me to the appropriate safety literature, I would be incredibly grateful!

Best regards,

Gary

More Gary Bywater's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions