Dear Sirs,
Recently, I have developed two new techniques: one is used to gauge both the intensity of tropical cyclones and the intensity of tropical cyclones; the other is used to identify significant signals of El Nino or La Nina. With these two tools,I have solved some important problems : one is the definition of "El nino years", "La Nina Years", Ocean Stabilization Index.....etc. Furthermore, a new theory called "Ocean Stabilization Machine" theory on global climate change has been proposed. And I gave the presentation in an important Peak BBS of Chinese Academy of Engineering in Hangzhou on October 25, which received very important attentions. Here, I am looking for some collaborators in other fields related to global climate change.
Thank you very much for your attention!
Could you elaborate on the ocean stability index? Do you have any write-ups on the same?
Every theory is difficult to be understood when it is new.
The idea has already been published in the paper which is peer reviewed for about three years by many experts(Nature, Scientific report, nature Communicate, Climate in the past,Journey of climate,......etc. I guess more than 50 top scientists had read the paper as a reviewer because I sent it to different magazings during different periods. Many editors thought the acadimia is very good,but it need a native speaker to correct the grammar. As you know it took 7 years I had no fundings, I couldn't pay the fee about 5000.$ to improve the whole paper's quality.
Recently, A friend loan me some money. So I can ask a foreign translation company
did the job for me now. Anyway, thank you very much for your attention.
PS: full paper is not allowed to be distributed due to the Int. J. climato. request me to do according to the copyright document.
You are very right to be involved with global warming, because there is so much happening in the weather. Yet, no theories!
I am concerned about the rise in humidity worldwide, obviously the oceans are evaporating at an increasing rate (have become unstable). Is your ocean index to do with this phenomenon?
English is not my tongue, but I can help "polish" some text,if you would like.
best wishes
In science, if we want to investigate any scientific problem, major influence factors should be given more priority to be investigated. However, only one field is an exception: that is global climate warming. Many scientists ignore the major climate influence factors and consider greenhouse effect due to human reasons to be the main reason , although they knew it is much smaller than the major climate factors.
Their logic is that the recent unusual trend of land surface temperature is non-periodic, major periodic factors only cause periodic changes.
Recently, after more than a half year's effort, we prove that the monthly anomaly of global land surface temperature can be fitted perfectly by a group of periodic functions, the verification results indicate that the correlated coefficients of more than 15,000 periodic functions are all more than 0.9.(Last year, I mentioned I found a function which its the correlated coefficient is 0.8)
I send the paper to one of the toppest IF magazines, the editor said" we know your reseach result is absolutely right,but many people already believe in this view, thousands of papers have already published , so we have to reject your paper. And we also tell you that no magazine is willing to publish your paper".
One anonymous email is send to me with the following word :
"Birth is much, but breeding is more."
In science, if we want to investigate any scientific problem, major influence factors should be given more priority to be investigated. However, only one field is an exception: that is global climate warming. Many scientists ignore the major climate influence factors and consider greenhouse effect due to human reasons to be the main reason , although they knew it is much smaller than the major climate factors.
Their logic is that the recent unusual trend of land surface temperature is non-periodic, major periodic factors only cause periodic changes.
Recently, after more than a half year's effort, we prove that the monthly anomaly of global land surface temperature can be fitted perfectly by a group of periodic functions, the verification results indicate that the correlated coefficients of more than 15,000 periodic functions are all more than 0.9.(Last year, I mentioned I found a function which its the correlated coefficient is 0.8)
I send the paper to one of the toppest IF magazines, the editor said" we know your reseach result is absolutely right,but many people already believe in this view, thousands of papers have already published , so we have to reject your paper. And we also tell you that no magazine is willing to publish your paper".
One anonymous email is send to me with the following word :
"Birth is much, but breeding is more."
You can watch this week, as the Cyclone Fani, instead of making landfall in the middle of India, is getting pushed by the wall of the Pakistan-Arabia Dust Cloud at 120 degrees off track towards the NE, to smack right in the center of Bangladesh. You can see from comparing the daily NAAPS dust cloud images with the storm track, that it only takes 20-40 micrograms of atmospheric dust per cubic meter, to make a tropical cyclone change its path? Instead, if we eliminate the atmospheric dust clouds, by replanting those areas with local native plants, then we could have the rain clouds come back naturally, and direct the rainfall from cyclones to desert areas, rather than create floods for the people of Bangladesh later on this week?