I will be very thankful to know your explanations about a such colleague weekly participate in heavily status at RG. In compare, with those of a little or slight weekly participate, but they have got high elevation or jumping in their weekly RG score? I am surprise? Is there convincing reasons for this strange problem ?
Your English is a little difficult to understand, but I suppose that you want to know why some of those members of RG who participated little in the question-and-answer column of RG in a week got a large increase of the RG score. I think that the reason is that their answers written earlier got many recommendations in that week.
Note added after reading Naseer Almukhtar's answer just below: "participated little in the question-and-answer column of RG" in the above answer of mine would be better to be replaced by "participated little in the activities at RG"; and "their answers written earlier" by "their activities made earlier".
Your English is a little difficult to understand, but I suppose that you want to know why some of those members of RG who participated little in the question-and-answer column of RG in a week got a large increase of the RG score. I think that the reason is that their answers written earlier got many recommendations in that week.
Note added after reading Naseer Almukhtar's answer just below: "participated little in the question-and-answer column of RG" in the above answer of mine would be better to be replaced by "participated little in the activities at RG"; and "their answers written earlier" by "their activities made earlier".
Dear Dr.Tatsuo,
I am sorry because the question is restricted within a limit words.
I mean all their contributions and( not only the question & answer) are largely decreased as compare with those of highly productive member, but with low RG weekly score.
Kind regards, Naseer Almukhtar
I think a lot of questions, answers, participation, follow-up and recommendations all lead to an increase in RG score
Greetings
I agree with respected Sir, Tatsuo Tabata's answer, it is comprehensive.
It is difficult to know the exact answer, but the number of recommendations and the score of those people making recommendations probably has something to do with an increase in the score.
Do not chase numbers, RG is a commercial, chase to help young scientists to find at least emotional rewards.
Good luck
Aly
Yes, agreed with your questions. RG score is complexity calculations.
Hi, all colleagues,
Definitely, I respect all your answers. But, I want to say here, that many members have very poor contributions in RG ( all RG categories, from Q&A till publications). However, they were presence subsequently with high weekly score. whereas, other members have a huge of participation (activities) in all RG categories, but they were presence subsequently with low weekly score? Why? This the core of my question, with my grateful & appreciations to all your replies.
Kind regards,
Naseer Almukhtar
I agree with the answers issued, especially with Tatsuo Tabata
Constant (frequent) participation in GR is important; both in personal publications, as well as in the development and updating of projects.
Likewise, the correct answers in the discussion networks together with the recommendations of comments and publications, add points for the qualification in RG.
regards Jose Luis
Thanks dear Dr. Jose' Luis, for your informative and a clarify wise answer.
Naseer Almukhtar
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Philosophy Of Science
- Reasoning