Subject: Clarification on Phase Consistency and Directionality of TDM in Different Coordinate Systems

Dear Theoretical Chemists,

I am currently exploring transition dipole moment (TDM) calculations for identical molecules positioned in different coordinate systems using quantum chemistry software (Orca, Gaussian). In these computations, I've observed that TDMs sometimes emerge with opposite signs despite representing the same physical transition in identically structured molecules. My hypothesis attributes this phenomenon to differences in phase conventions used by different computational methods, which is evident from the orbital visualizations.

This phase variation seems to alter the sign of the TDM vector calculated, potentially leading to misinterpretation of the directionality which should physically be from the 'hole' to the 'particle' as indicated by the transition density difference. The output from Orca and Gaussian suggests a fixed sign for the TDM vector that might not consistently align with the physical direction from electron depletion to electron accumulation regions. I ma using TDA-DFT, b3lyp/def2tzvp Orca/Gaussian.

Given this context, I seek clarification on the following:

  • Phase Alignment: How can one ensure that the phase conventions across different systems or computational methods align to reflect a consistent and physically meaningful direction for the TDM vector?
  • Physical Significance: In practical terms, should the TDM vector direction always reflect the transition from hole to particle, and how can we adjust our computational practices to reliably represent this?
  • Recommendations for Analysis: Would analyzing the transition density difference alongside TDM calculations be a recommended approach to verify the correct directionality of the TDM vector? If so, how should this analysis be integrated routinely in computational workflows?
  • Your insights into these questions would be invaluable in helping to standardize and interpret TDM calculations accurately across different computational frameworks.

    Thank you for your time and expertise.

    Best regards,

    Alexander, Technion

    More Alexander Kaushansky's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions