Can I have a paper that have followed all the procedure to calculate the residual stresses using nanoindentation, which has all parameters given so that I could easily follow it up?
Several investigations have been performed to address this issue. Among them, Suresh [1] and Lee [2] methodologies are most popular to obtain residual stress from nanoindentation, based on the analysis of contact area difference between a residual stress-free material and the same material with residual stress, as in the case of Suresh’s work, or by considering the stress interaction between the residual stress and the contact pressure from the viewpoint of the shear plasticity, as proposed by Lee.
[1] S. Suresh, A.E. Giannakopoulos A new method for estimating residual stresses by instrumented sharp indentation. Acta Mater, 46 (1998), pp. 5755-5767
Article A New Method for Estimating Residual Stresses by Instrumente...
[2] Y.H. Lee, D. Kwon. Measurement of residual-stress effect by nanoindentation on elastically strained (100) W. Scripta Mater, 49 (2003), pp. 459-465
Article Measurement of residual-stress effect by nanoindentation on ...
Edwan Anderson Ariza Thanks for the good response.
These are the methodologies or procedure for the nanoindentation. What I need is a case study in which one or more of these methodologies have been applied. So that I could fully trace and understand how to follow up this problem.
Experimental investigations of nanoindentation have been conducted on many material and thin film systems to extract residual stresses but, as concluded by several researches, there is no one set method that appears to work for all materials.
I am sharing two chapters of books (summarizing some methods that you can follow up for this purpose) and one article (a case study) using the two methodologies that I had previously commented (Suresh and Lee models) applied in metastable Ni-B alloy coatings.
Concerted efforts have been made to measure residual stresses on different materials. Measurements of residual stresses have been reportedly carried out by X-ray diffraction (XRD) method, strain gauge (Grellner et al., 1997), depth-sensing method. This review is focused on the depth-sensing method. Carlsson and Larsson (2001), Swadner et al. (2001) and Zhang et al. (2012) used Tabor’s relation (Tabor, 1951) to compare hardness values from stressed and referenced samples.
The measurement of residual stress using hardness values is based on the premise that if the same load were applied to the referenced and stressed samples, significant differences would be observed in the measured depth, contact area and the hardness of the two samples. These differences in the measured hardness would thus be attributed to the magnitude and type of the residual stress prevailing in the stressed sample. Thus, a brittle material with tensile residual stress would show less resistance to the indentation force whereas the one with compressive residual stress would show more resistance to the indentation force. For this method, the determination of the hardness values of the referenced and stressed specimens is based on the hardness described in Section 5.1. This method is simple to use but its limitation is that two samples are needed before the residual stress of the stressed sample can be estimated. The need for the referenced sample may increase the experimental cost. For more information, peruse the following journal by Zhang et al., (2012).
Zhang, Y., Allahkarami, M., Hanan, J.C. 2012. Measuring residual stress in ceramic zirconia-porcelain crowns by nanoindentation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 6, 120-127.