A ring R is simple if it has no two-sided ideal. A ring R is Abelian if each idempotent in R is central and R is domain if for each a,b in R, ab=0 implies that a=0 or b=0.
Do you include the existence of multiplicative identity 1 to axioms of ring? If so, then every simple Abelian ring is a domain.
Indeed, assume ring R is Abelian but is not a domain, i.e. there is a couple of non-zero elements a, b whose product is 0. Consider subset X_a of R consisting of all those x \in R, for which xa = 0. This X_a is a left ideal (if xa = 0, then for every y we have yxa = 0, if ua = 0 and va = 0 then (u + v)a = 0), by commutativity this ideal is two-sided, it is not the zero ideal (b \in X_a) and it is not the whole ring: 1 does not belong to X_a.
So we demonstrated that R contains a non-trivial two-sided ideal.
Note that by the definition I've mentioned before a ring R is Abelian if each idempotent of R is central. there are Abelian rings which are not commutative rings. for example, every division ring is Abelian but not commutative.
Thank you for pointing this. I missed the definition, sorry! In this case the reasoning from my previous post demonstrates the following weaker statement:
your ring R does not have idempotent divisors of zero. This is not too much ...