https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335933492_New_Concept_of_Physics_Energy_Behaviour_and_Its_Application_in_Cosmology_to_Define_Gravity_Value_from_Einstein's_Relativity

Modhar Torki The percentage of dark matter has been calculated by comparing the estimated mass of visible matter with the estimated mass due to gravitational lensing around the galaxy or galaxy cluster.

The dark energy calculation is based on a false interpretation of the recession velocity data from distant galaxies. There is no dark energy and the expansion of the universe is not accelerating. Instead the unexpected recession velocity of distant galaxies is caused by gravitational acceleration towards the centre of mass of the galaxy distribution.

Data Prerecording of Conference Presentation on Dark Matter and Dark Energy

Richard

I do not remember which was which but one was 4 %, and one was 27 %

Of something ????

Anyway 1 / ( e + 1 ) = 1 / 3.718281828 = 0.268 941 421 which is around 27% ??

This could be just a coincidence but it may also be significant. An interesting find.

The rise of huge amount of the mass of dark matter between the objects or particles is caused the acceleration of gravitational lensing . So the dark energy is existed.....In addition to that, there is an evidence of the existence of dark matter in the universe which confirmed by observed the ratio of density for this matter. They find that does not correspond with the mass of the visible universe. And, when they are applying the General relativity theory, they will produce mass that which exceeding the observed mass. So, we need a new equation to calculate values of this mass .

No. The amount of dark matter is estimated by presuming that the rotational curves of the outer parts of galaxies require more mass than is visible. It is likely that there is something going on that we don't understand, but the simplest assumption is that there IS something there, and THAT is called dark matter simply because we can't see it. The value for dark energy is based on the presumption that the Universe is "flat", so that its overall "mass/energy" is equal to the "critical" mass required to balance it on the edge between expansion and collapse (so that it is neither "round" nor "hyperbolic"). But the assumption that the Universe is flat is probably wrong (it is almost certainly hyperbolic). The problem is that the Observable Universe is only a tiny part of the actual Universe, and getting smaller all the time, as objects near its current limit are being carried away from us and out of the "Observable" Universe by the expansion of the intervening space. Odds are that just as the Earth is round, but any small part of it looks more or less flat because it's too small a part of the Earth to tell that it IS round, the Universe is also NOT flat, but the part we can see LOOKS flat simply because it is too small for us to tell anything otherwise. And if that is true, then dark energy is just a fiction made up to explain what we can never observe or explain, and save the sanity of cosmologists (or at least give them a way to publish more nonsensical papers).

I have got this result by using mathematical model.. n=(3402543612) .... % of dark matter=(22,5) .....% of visible objects=(4,1)

n=(8578350730) .... % of dark matter=(22,6) .....% of visible objects=(3,9).

n=(13617503780) .. % of dark matter=(22,7) .....% of visible objects=(3,8).

n=(33333333333) .... % of dark matter=(22,9) .....% of visible objects=(3,7).

n=(7998993140224) .... % of dark matter=(23,3) .....% of visible objects=(3,3).... Where n=the number of layers for Spacetime

I found the percentage for (dark matter + visible objects) = (26,66666666666666666666666...) %

At this discussion, there is a great convergence of the results that I obtained with the observed results, and I would like to clarify by the model that I am working on it .

1- I can calculate the dark mass or the visible mass with respect of the spacetime.

2-the reason of curvature of spacetime.

In addition to that. I have drawn the center of masses for both visible objects and dark matter in multiple dimensions. The side view of the universe show that looks like a cone, and the top view for the visible objects have rotation move like a spiral.

𝑈𝐸𝑅𝑒𝑃𝑛 = 𝐷𝐸𝑚𝑎𝑥

Or, the maximum amount of Dark Energy to exist in the Universe, being based on the number of Universal-energy-radius-points with their energies added together to form 𝐷𝐸𝑚𝑎𝑥. A further analysis

could imply that 𝐷𝐸𝑚𝑎𝑥 is a certain percentage of the

Universal-energy UE. Knowing this one could then

make a full UE equation by the following:

[eq. 20.]

𝑈𝐸 =𝐷𝐸𝑚𝑎𝑥 + 𝑃𝐸𝑚𝑎𝑥, PE being Positive Energy, (Scott, Nicholas Alexander Page 8, “Condensed Matter involving Dark Matter and Negative Mass”).

Going back to energy-mass-points,

[eq. 21.]

𝐸𝑀𝑃 =− 𝐷𝑀(𝑅 − 𝑀𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝐴𝑈 𝑈𝑅)

Whereas, AU is astronomical units and UR is

Universal Radius, assuming the Universe is finite,

and it is theorized by most but ever-expanding.

Meaning the amount of Dark Energy could be expanding

in acceleration., (Scott, Nicholas Alexander Page 9, “Condensed Matter involving Dark Matter and Negative Mass”).

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352412232_Condensed_Matter_involving_Dark_Matter_and_Negative_Mass

Also, we can calculate the dark energy that required to condense visible object by finding the acceleration of increase mass for dark matter itself that associated with visible object.

Emmanouil Markoulakis

If we want to describe the nature of vacuum, then we first must consider the energy density E of gravitational fields. This energy density is given by E=-g²/(8πG),g=MG/r². G is the gravitational constant, r is the distance to the centre of mass M, which generates the gravitational acceleration g.

If we inspect the content of a high-end vacuum chamber at sea level, we find some rest gas, some photons and the gravitational energy density. The energy density value then is about E=-57.408.000.000 J/m³ or -5.7408 1010J/m³ (rounded to five digits).

If we then doubt that an absolute negative energy density exists, we must assume that a homogenous cosmic energy density exists, which everywhere overcompensates the negative gravitational energy density. The cosmic gravitational field must have an energy density of about 5.0E24 J/m³ to overcompensate the negative energy density of neutron star gravity.

If we again inspect the content of the vacuum chamber, we can assume that cosmic energy is inside the chamber and as well omnipresent everywhere. This energy density is of gravitational nature. Because it is homogenous, it does not exert any force. We do not have any sensor, which is capable to detect this energy density.

The only thing we know is that it must be present if an absolute negative energy density cannot exist.

We could enter in a discussion about the possibility of the existence of negative energy and a negative mass equivalent. But this discussion leads to nowhere.

Kindly check the attached article's link:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335933492_New_Concept_of_Physics_Energy_Behaviour_and_Its_Application_in_Cosmology_to_Define_Gravity_Value_from_Einstein's_Relativity