Is there a systematic method that reviewers or editors can use for bibliometric publications? Is there a checklist with a solid methodology on this subject? In the feedback I received from the referees, I saw some were unfamiliar with bibliometric analysis and software. It is not possible to meet some demands and requests of the referees. For example, some reviewers find the images too colorful and asked why we don't use colorless graphics. They also criticize why text cannot be written inside a JPEG or PNG image. Have you encountered similar situations? What were the most extreme request and demands? What did you do to persuade the reviewers and the editor? I appreciate any help you can provide.
Refer "Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses" by Martina K Linnenluecke, Mauricio Marrone, Abhay K Singh
Thank you for sharing. However, in the related article, just bibliometric software is introduced, and there are no arguments to guide the referee process.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematical Sciences
- Statistics
- Statistical Software
- SPSS