When one reads old books or articles from the XVIIIth or XIXth centuries or early XXth century the style of these scientific texts approached literary (belles-lettres) style. Authors had a characteristic and very fascinating manner and elegance depending on the age and the language of the authors. Look at the works of Aristotle, Avicenna, Carolus Linnaus, René-Antoine Réaumur, Maria Sibylla Merian, Immanuel Kant, Charles Darwin, etc. Regarding the scientific style of our age this is only a skeleton containing basic information and stylistically totally uniformed when compared with the manner of classical scientists/authors.

I used to mention literature, music, art, history and mythology when delivering lectures and today a student has asked me why I have not written an entomology textbook containing these elements. I told her that the reviewer would delete immediately these unnecessary things.

Is there an opportunity to make scientific writing more interesting? Certainly, I do not think on popular tricks. May have negative consequences of the lack of real style in scientific writing?

More András Bozsik's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions