"I am conducting research to determine whether a formula exists to systematically identify all possible addends (summands) that compose any given integer greater than two. By 'addends,' I refer to distinct sets of numbers that, when summed, equal the integer in question. For example, for the number 5, we get sets such as {1+4}, {2+3}, {1+1+3}, and so on.
I have already developed a formula that addresses this question, but I am reaching out to this esteemed community for additional perspectives. I would like to know if anyone can provide or suggest other formulas, insights, or approaches that tackle this problem effectively. I believe collaboration could enhance our understanding of the topic and perhaps reveal deeper implications in number theory or combinatorial mathematics.
I welcome any thoughts, references, or alternative formulas that you might be willing to share!"
Dear Antonio BORJA Escultura
An effective way to systematically identify all possible addends (or integer partitions) of a given integer n > 2 is through the concept of integer partitioning, a well-studied topic in combinatorics. The number of possible partitions of n (i.e., all combinations of positive integers that sum to n, regardless of order) is denoted by the partition function p(n). However, when we seek distinct sets of addends—disregarding order but possibly including or excluding repeated values—we can use constraints in our partitioning. One method is to employ generating functions. For instance, the generating function for the number of partitions into distinct integers is Π(1 + x^k) from k=1 to ∞, and into non-distinct integers is Π(1 - x^k)^(-1). These can be expanded and manipulated symbolically to enumerate the valid addend sets for any given n.
Alternatively, a recursive algorithmic approach also yields a formulaic system to generate all such sets. One well-known recursive formulation for unrestricted integer partitions is: P(n, m) = P(n - m, m) + P(n, m - 1), where P(n, m) is the number of partitions of n with the largest addend ≤ m, with base conditions such as P(0, m) = 1 and P(n, 0) = 0. This recursive strategy can be adapted to generate the actual sets, not just their counts, and further refined to include or exclude repetitions depending on whether the goal is to find distinct addend sets. By programming this approach or using symbolic math tools like Mathematica or SageMath, one can exhaustively list all valid combinations for any n. This flexible, structured methodology complements any closed-form formula, offering deeper insight into the nature and structure of integer partitions.
I hope this helps.
Dear Félix Oscar Socorro Márquez;
Thank you very much for sharing your valuable ideas on my created formula, your direct observation to my formula that it could systematically identify all possible addends is a very welcome development to my formula. Again thank you sir for your effort and time given to answer my question. Thank you in valuing research study like me.
- Badges
- Science topic