"I thought about quantum mechanics a hundred times more than general relativity, but I still don't understand," Einstein said.
Perhaps the most difficult to understand is the wave-particle duality, which may be because the understanding of it is only in the form of mathematics.In fact, no one can actually verify the wave-particle duality, because the experiment can't verify a single photon.
Electrons orbiting the nucleus of the cycle and the volatility of the particles there are closely linked, we can think of chemical bonds between atoms and atomic are fluctuating, at a certain moment because electronic is only a position on the orbit, and from the time a constantly changing position, the this kind of change has the regularity.When two atoms of electrons near each other, two atoms repel each other, and when electrons in an atom near the nucleus of another atom when they will attract each other, so that can form regularity of volatility.
Inner surface cracks in the double-slit experiment of atom has been in a regular wave conditions, when the particle is trying to through the gap, when near the atom will be fluctuations in the perforated of atomic bomb, a reflection of photonic and electronic electromagnetic ejection in such a state of regular fluctuations, as the accumulation of time and the number of regular interference fringes are formed.The smaller the momentum of a particle is, the larger the Angle of the ejection is, the greater the spacing of the stripes, the longer the wavelength is.
Electronic counter near the double slit to observe, emitting a large number of photon hits the aperture inner surface of atoms, and makes the surface atomic wave interference, can be seen as inhibits such a state of regular wave, the particles will no longer through double slit by regular reflection and ejection, which in turn has emerged two bright stripe.
This is why increasing gap width will not cause interference and diffraction, because of the emitted particles and gap edge contact and collision probability becomes a matter of fact interference and diffraction and crack width, crack of fluctuations, particle momentum, launch position and the Angle of aperture.
No there isn't. All this is understood and taught in physics courses, so it would be useful to actually study quantum mechanics, instead of trying to guess.
These lectures: http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/III_toc.html might be a good place to start.
Cf. also https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-04-quantum-physics-i-spring-2013/
No there isn't. All this is understood and taught in physics courses, so it would be useful to actually study quantum mechanics, instead of trying to guess.
These lectures: http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/III_toc.html might be a good place to start.
Cf. also https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-04-quantum-physics-i-spring-2013/
You can understand the wave-particle duality very easily mathematically: A particle is something whose spatial dimensions are very small (for small a, see below). But let's assume in 1-D a particle has the density(in mass, charge or whatever) n(x)=a/[pi*(a*a+x*x)]; If you think about it, this density has an integral of 1 , just like you have a finite particle mass, charge etc. Next, note that this density is the following integral:
n(x)=(2/pi)integral_(-infinityy)^infinity exp(-ikx) exp(-|k|a)dk. So this particle density is represented by a sum of WAVES exp(ikx), with weight exp(-|k|a) which is apprecible for |k|
Bohr realized in 1913 there is nothing related between the frequencies of atomic spectra and the atom's mechanical cyclic behaviour. Wave Mechanics (1925) smuggled in cyclic behaviour by mathematizing de Broglie's wave/momentum hypothesis; little realizing that he actually believed in a PHYSICAL electron cycle, which I have explicitly built upon in my Universal Electron Theory (UET).
Sheer waste of time, as corpuscles and "corpuscular aspects" do not exist at microphysical scale.
"Wave-particle duality" is like the gods: ridiculus lies they tell to the children.
But the Broglian intrinsic frequency mc²/h still exists. Even when the war-hatchet is brandished against.
The electromagnetic Dirac-Schrödinger intrinsic frequency 2mc²/h still exists, and has been proved experimentally.
The absorbers still exist, though denied by the Göttingen-København sect and their heirs.
The formalism which permits successful calculations remains purely deterministic and purely undulatory.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317605373_Fifteen_surreptitious_copenhaguist_and_corpuscularist_postulates_we_do_not_more_accept
They obliged you to confuse individual waves with collectives of waves and with waves in a collectivity of matter.
To deny the atomic limit in undulatory, prescribe to confuse all kind of “waves”, each individual wave (quantic wave) with any collective of waves, and these collectives with gravity waves or elastic waves in a collective of matter, then mathematically unify all these kinds: the individual waves (quantic ones), the collective, and the waves in a material collectivity. The Born-Heisenberg copenhaguism is founded on this trick, and it is so for ninety years. A hegemonic swindle.
Tip: an individual wave has only one emitter and only one absorber.
This mistake is less dangerous when applied to photons (the smallest quantity of electromagnetic transfer): They are bosons, so they attract each other and pack into herds of same frequency and habitus, especially on astronomical distances.
But this mistake becomes enormous when you apply it to electrons (the smallest quantity of electric charge). On the one hand, their minus charges energetically repel each other, so the collective energetically diverges. On the other hand, they are fermions, so they avoid each other, each in a distinct quantic state.
The teaching and the popularization pull your leg on this matter: they tell you that in an interference experiment, like an Aharonov-Bohm style, the beam of electrons has a common phase!
Only spherical waves originate at a point but all the particle's "associated" waves are plane waves, even to the point of origin. Once again, uncritical acceptance of symbology (math) is substituted for physical analysis.
Particle-wave duality only exists in commonly accepted formulation of quantum mechanics. In reality, electron cycles are electron cycles and wave function is an operator defining, particularly, that cycles.
@Alex Soiguine
Alex:
Please explain the meaning of your answer: "... electron cycles are electron cycles ... ". "A is A" adds nothing to our understanding which is based on making connections between DIFFERENT entities, properties, etc, like B=A.
Abdelkader Mohamed Elsayed Alexander Soiguine
Gentlemen:
I wrote up the answer to your questions in my paper [UET6A] - please read.
An atom without temperature is a dead atom, nothing would move without temperature even electron. over 99.99% of an atom is space, the space as it get temperature it creates wave. the communication of hadron with Electron is through this wave in space of the atom. Wave is transferring information not particle. There is no wave particle duality exist.
Article Quantum Intelligent Space
Javad Fardaei
Dear Javad:
Temperature is a Many-Body (statistical) concept. A hydrogen atom is a two-body system (all that calculus can solve). Why do you keep catching "Red Herrings"?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Quantum Physics