In fact photons created at the beginning of the big bang should have a space to travel until now , is the possibility that all the space vibrate create and extend this space for photons at the speed of photons?
The wavelength you mentioned, 1,609.344 meters long, when traveling at the speed of light (299,792,458 meters per second), would create a vibrational frequency of 186,282.4 cycles per second. This frequency falls within the range of radio waves in the electromagnetic spectrum, well below the highest frequency found in gamma rays.
The concept of the Planck scale is crucial here. It represents the theoretical limit beyond which our current understanding breaks down. The Planck frequency (Fp = 1.855×10^43 Hz) is this limit, and frequencies at the time of the Big Bang would likely surpass even this threshold, making them immeasurable by any known means.
At the scale of the Big Bang, the wavelengths related to a terrestrial mile are minuscule and not significant. The frequencies and speeds involved in that cosmic event transcend our current understanding, potentially even surpassing the speed of light mathematically.
Therefore, the specific wavelength you mentioned isn't considerable when discussing the scale and dynamics of the Big Bang due to the vast and incomprehensible nature of the frequencies and speeds involved.
Thank you very much for answering my question. My calculation gives the equation for the “absolute” time required for light to travel one “absolute” terrestrial mile. In other words, there is a vibrational wave traveling at speed c and whose length corresponds to the “absolute” terrestrial mile. I still don't know what this "natural" and fundamental physical object is which has these characteristics that I have just mentioned! I can't find anything in physics that corresponds to this. That’s why I’m asking people to see at their side what it’s all about!
Note that the time I calculated does not come from (1mile terrestre /c)= time. But I have find an equation to calculate the value of this latter ratio. Means I do not use the value 1.609344 and 299793.458 in my calculation. I have used another means to calculate it. there is a new theory behind.