Why do we have fractional electrically charged quarks but not fractionally magnetic charged quarks?
No-localization of electric charges on a brane doesn't imply that the dual charges are localized on another brane. The relation is more involved: https://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~jus/0302/song.pdf
https://lib-extopc.kek.jp/preprints/PDF/1982/8211/8211084.pdf
You dont need them because there is no magnetic monopole.
A magnetic dipole would just be a tiny current loop....Is not similar to an electric dipole.
Actually, an electric charge is a monopole of the Mobius Transformation of the magnetic dipole....Just as time is space monopole of the Mobius Transformation a moment-dipole. Just take one charge to infinity and you get the monopole.
One charge is a monopole, I dont have to take it to infinity.
Transformations do not have monopoles, space has monopoles.
No way can I see the linear fractional transformation (2 by 2 matrix)
doing what you say.
Time is a space monopole?
If someone understands you, that someone let me know.
Space field, I said, is a monopole field of a time dipole.. Each moment is a dipole of future past states tied in a dipole symmetry, and each moment dipole generates a monopole space field that is essentially a Mobius transformation of one monopole to infinity. Just like the electric charge is an infinite field that is associated with a magnetic dipole...that is also the connection with the Lorentz transformation being a Mobius transformation....Look at the Riemann sphere..
Maybe you can tell me where you get this stuff.
Then I may understand you.
An electric charge is not the field of the electric charge.
The field associated with a magnetic dipole is simply a magnetic field.
The only time things get mixed up a bit is
a) In the special theory of relativity, where you transform electric fields into magnetic or vice versa, within limits. You do this with frame transformations, which may transform a simple charge into a current.
b) In the so called symmetric version of electromagnetism, which assumes the magnetic monopole, so you have div(B) not equal to zero, same as div(D) is not equal to zero.
There you can do some transformations described in Jacksons book
Are you using one of these two?
Are you calling the Lorenz transformation a moebius transformation?
Your language is very confusing. Time dipole is a time varying dipole.?
future past state is in the past or the future?
When I say charge I mean the net negative electric field created by the charge which is considered to be virtual photon interactions. A lotentz transformation is mathematically a mobius tranformation.
Ok, I see you are very inexperienced. The electric field is neither positive or negative, its just an electric field, distinct from charge. You know its there from the force on a charge. F = q E
Suggest you go to basics (basic electricity and magnetism), forget virtual photons , and most of the other stuff.
I think you are taking things too literally in a discussion and I am sorry I offended your intelligence. I have written books that show new ways of defining charges through mathematical model. By charge I mean the invariant quantity that generates the field.. electric charge generates an electric field, a mass charge generates a gravitational potential (secondary effect in my theory) ... Between charges, fields act to generate motions of the charges.. Now the interchangeability of the electric field and the magnetic field are obvious.. The electric field can be attractive or repulsive depending on the charges being positive or negative..
Where I get this stuff? Start by considering an information field and define the information states as "charges" such that the net information charge is zero before a measurement.. Imagine an electron and positron pair of CHARGES tied together in dipole electric field. Take one charge to infinity (Mobius transform the field on the Riemann sphere) and you get an infinite electric field with source as a monopole charge at the south pole. The same thing happens with information charges. In a quantum query, if one considers that the query has charges that are tied in the vacuum symmetry as a net null information charge state, for example. If one does a transformation that takes one result (information charge) to infinity, one gets a monopole information charge with an infinite field that permeates space as a classical result. That information field is casually consistent only if we treat the motions of observers as relativistically causal and as such no one can get a dipole state of information in a classical continuum. Take time and read my books, The Principles of Causal Conspiracy 1&2. I say that the space field is also a monopole field for every observer, that is tied in the vacuum symmetry prior to observation as a charge dipole symmetry we call a moment (future-past charges). I consider the space field as a maximized future-past dipole in the vacuum that you maximize to get a monopoly past space field. So in a sense, each query is a maximization of a dipole state or a multipole charge to a classical observable monopole charge, and each moment generates a monopole space field as an information space that is classical just as the positron-electron pair can be transformed to a monopole electron electric charge with an infinite field that connects to the conjugate state at infinite (antimatter). So our past space field at each moment is separated from a conjugate future space field by spatial infinity even though it is a moment separated away on a parallel membrane that has all the conjugate states we don't get when we measure. So matter and antimatter live on parallel membranes separated by spatial infinity and a moment in time as a dipole pair of past and future.
1. Each quantum result now means a generation of a dual world of symmetry rather than a multiword of Everett. Economy.
2. It also means quantum theory is the master theory that generates the relativistic fields we call space and time. It also means that the universe is classical monopoly logical field not multipolar illogical field.
3.It also means that gravity is a secondary effect of the attraction of matter and antimatter between the two sheets. It also means symmetry of matter and antimatter is maintained.
4. It also gives us a logical information footing for classical and quantum theories. They are both consistent and agree.
5. It also means the maximization process (speed at which information charge is mobs transformed to infinity of the observer) is regulated by the mathematics of a Casimir field.
6. It also means we can view a lot of cosmological anomalies as a result of the influences of unseen sheet.
7. It also means that the universe want to annihilate itself by expanding to spatial infinity where all information is again tied in the quantum symmetry of a dipole field.
By the way, think of charges as sources and sinks for fields and you need not imagine charges as independent of the fields....
I would argue the inverse way.
Why do you need charges?
a) Because they exist. Protons and electrons exist and matter is made of atoms.
Electrons are accelerated in tubes and you can see the images.
They carry the current in wires.
b) They are sources of the electric or magnetic field (the later when moving)
c) They are needed to detect the fields through qE, or q v cross B as needed.
You have to understand that I am in physics. I dont believe in math models for math sake.
It has to respect reality. We live in the real world.
Electric and magnetic fields may only be interchanged if you change the reference system, in special relativity. But if you are working in a lab there is no confusion.
Maxwells equations dictates how the dynamics works between electric and magnetic fields. along with div(B)=0, div (D)= rho
That quantum theory generates space and time? Please study basic physics.
Could charges be the sources and sinks only limited to finite space instead of points and therefore acquire mass? Surely we do not expect the interior of an electron to have a field? It will explode or we may have to call for the internal structure of leptons as comprising parts that overcome the fields of repulsion. Here is a table showing magnetic quarks.