Covidence seems to have have very strong relevance in the medical and health sciences when doing a literature review. I am currently working on Students well-being in higher education using covidence for the texts screening. I have not been able to figure out the relevance of the quality assessment template in my data extraction stage.
The quality assessment template in Covidence, a tool used for systematic reviews and research synthesis, may have limitations in humanities and education domains research. While Covidence is widely used in healthcare and medicine, its quality assessment template might not fully capture the complexities and nuances of research in humanities and education.
Humanities and education research often involves qualitative studies, mixed methods, and diverse methodologies, which may not fit neatly into the template's categories. Additionally, the template's focus on bias and risk of bias might not be as relevant in humanities and education research, where context, interpretation, and perspective are crucial.
Researchers in these fields might need to adapt or modify the template to suit their specific needs or use alternative quality assessment tools that better align with their research paradigms.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Vectorization