The uncertainty principle is the mathematical statement that the product of the variances of canonically conjugate variables is bounded from below, under certain assumptions, that don't hold in classical mechanics, hold however, for quantum mechanical systems. All these words have a very precise meaning.

It doesn't make sense to ask about ``generalizing it to logic''.

I see "x" but I doub that I see "x," I check it in another sense and make assuption it exist or doesynt exist. But dont eat sh... im sorry. Something could be percept by one type of sense somebody of other senses. To request Your question we need structure of veryfication, some logic of cognition. I propose one in this aricle, unfortunately in polish.

@Stam Nicolis

Thanks for your first answer dear Stam

your answer is definition of a term of question ,well , for answer you have many assume (assumptions and hypothesis) , but i look this problem more basically and fundamental , generalized uncertainty theorem to higher level (as axiom) in formal structure (for have more sense take theorem to logic layer) , in formal system i mean in the principle system (axiom & structures) ; our logic make a statement ( implies uncertainty statement ) such as one of the implications of this statement destroy our logic and make it minimum 50% of certain ; This is a terrible thing & have formidable philosophy implications .

So what would we do ?

Are the we arrived to edge of human logic (can we bound or margin the logic?) ?

Mathematicians and physicists try to destroy themselves?

I got involved too many questions.

it's my pleasure to discussion more with you.

Stam Nicolis

@Stam Nicolis

نقل قول از دکترعلی داد خواه :

"

چون بر اساس اصول ریاضی که فرض کرده اییم با منطق ریاضی اثبات میکنیم این رابطه رو پس قطعیت دارد.

"

Ali Dadkhah

" generalize the uncertainty principle in logic if we assume that (100%) of uncertainty is certain (100%) is uncertainty, distinct, and unobtrusive?"

Can you generalize the laws of mathematics in logic, by assuming that an object is 100% white and 100% black, distinct and unobtrusive?

Let us start from contradiction, we could refer everything what exist. Another article about contradiction below. Rest is relations and properties, between and objects. In analysis we will assume what is true and what is false. How formalize Russels paradox ?

@Piotr,

How it is possible that one object be 100% certain and also 100% uncertain? Which logic admits A = not A ?

Probability. I do not certain but it is equivocation uncertainty: as doubtful of certain is propable. What You think maybe that will be better to understand.

It seems that radical uncertainty is self-refuting. One could consistently claim skepticism of many things but rest on a few (or even one) self-evident principles or properly basic beliefs, but stating that we can't know anything cannot be rationally maintained.

@Piotr Grabowski

Piotr Grabowski

Dear Piotr

thanks for your recommend article

i try to translate and understand it ...

as i know its about scientific beliefs and our thoughts ,and knowledge we know in the area of language (as linguistics problems) so i guess our logic (human logic that we know) included (inside) in our language and my problem (is the principle of uncertainty , certain ?) caused by it .

how can we make distinct ?

nothing from everything ...

@Piotr Grabowski

Piotr Grabowski

Read some about epistemic logic. As lack.

If the uncertainty principle is a valid proposition then the relationship between incident and activity is logically certain, that is, you can't know both, as defined. At the quantum level properties like random decay, superposition and indetermanism apply, whereas in the regular world events are far more stable and predictable.

But We got boundary values like GPS and speedmetrum. Is logically :) (x ->z ^ y->z) -> (x ^ y -> z))

case one uses 2 logics (1st the logic to the theory, 2nd the logic about the theory-logic (epi-logic), where the logic should be fuzzy/neutrosophic and the epi-logic must be the binary one), then the question can be answered by yes/no.