Dear Abu-Hussein Muhamad The journal “International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences” is definitely a journal with ‘issues’. Red flags are:
-Listed in the stand-alone version of the Beall’s list (https://beallslist.net/standalone-journals/ )
-Their indexing info https://www.ijmrhs.com/indexed-in/ is full of misleading metrics (https://beallslist.net/misleading-metrics/ ) such as GIF, DRJI often used by predatory journals/publishers
-Most importantly: the claimed indexed in Clarivate’s ESCI index is false! (can be checked here https://mjl.clarivate.com/home )
For me this would be enough to stay away from this one.
Here are a few models to consider while assessing a diary's authenticity:
Peer-survey process: Does the diary have a thorough companion audit process that includes free specialists in the field?
Publication board: Does the diary have a respectable and different article block made of specialists in the field?
Ordering: Is the diary filed in trustworthy data sets, like PubMed, Scopus, or Web of Science?
Distribution expenses: Are the distribution charges sensible and straightforwardly unveiled? Ruthless diaries frequently charge high expenses and may not unveil them forthright.
Contact data: Does the diary give clear contact data, including an email address and actual location?
In view of these measures, you can direct further examination on the Global Diary of Clinical Exploration and Wellbeing Sciences to decide its authenticity. You can likewise actually look at Beall's Rundown of expected ruthless diaries and distributers or the Index of Open Access Diaries to check whether the diary is recorded there.