In my country, the benefit from a specific paper is proportional according to the sequence of the researcher’s name in the paper, where (100%, 80% and 70%) for the first, the second and the third researcher respectively, and if there are additional researchers, then they will not get any benefit from the research.
Please reply, share us your opinions about the discussion
Thanks
Dear Dr. Mohammed N J Alzaidy ,
With you, son of my country, in the same case. I am looking with you, to dear colleagues contributions .
Regards.
Yes , the degree to which it gets in the performance appraisal and promotions .
Dear Dr. Mohammed N J Alzaidy ,
With you, son of my country, in the same case. I am looking with you, to dear colleagues contributions .
Regards.
I believe that all the contribution researchers should have the same degree of the assesment so they will not care about the sequence of there names
سابقا في بلدي العراق كان التقييم نفسه للباحثين المشتركين .ولكن تم تغيير قانون الترقيات وأصبح للباحث الاول الدرجة كاملة اما الباحث الثاني فأقل وكذلك الباحث الثالث رغم أنهم قد يتساوى في الجهد.
Previously, in Iraq, the evaluation was the same for the participating researchers. However, the promotion law was changed and the first researcher became the full class. The second researcher and the third researcher, although they may be equal in the effort.
no way
first (corresponding) author is main one
then, in some journals, the last one (boss :))))
Thanks to all RG colleagues for sincerely contributions with this discussion
Regards
For many North American universities (or at least the ones I have been associated with), there are three positions that count more than the others. First author is the desired spot, but second author is also good (for many projects involving a resident or graduate student, the resident whose project it is will be first author, and the person directly advising that person will take the second spot). Last author is also a desired position, as last position is code for the person in whose lab/research group the study took place: last is often the senior author of the paper.
Supposedly all researchers should have the same degree of the assessment.
But Currently in Iraq the first researcher full class, and the second researcher less, as well as the third researcher.
Thanks to all researchers for their contribution with this discussion.
It is usually assumed that the 1st author is the primary. But in fact often the case, that the main - the latest. It also happens that the main author of the 1st author as it "forgets" to include in the list of authors of the book or article
Mohammed, various HEIs have a range of measurement criteria that they ascribe to the order of the authors as they appear on a publication. As such different percentages are awarded if the authors of the same institution appear on a single publication. However, there is also the tendency for some institutions not to ascribe any numerical value to some authors whose names tend to appear beyond the third author. It is also possible to see institutions that award numerical values to their faculty members who have collaborated with other authors in different institutions. Therefore, different practices abound in different institutions.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Education