Dear my professor

This is a very good question to talk about it. Because the article title acts like a storefront in a supermarket and it can appeal the readers whether to continue reading the rest of paper or Not, or even to purchase it or Not.

In my opinion and as the literature showed, shorter titles are more suitable because they were cited more than longer ones. So, I think using an interesting, informative, tone reflecting and content predicting phrase which include important keywords sounds great.

Dear Dr. Arzani

My supervisor in M.Sc.

Hi and deep regards,

You gave the best answer to your own question.

It's better to have the title as a phrase rather than a sentence. However, the title may sometimes be a question.

I think that title should not display all the content of the paper because the title and keywords complete each other in this regard. In most cases it is more appropriate that the title of the paper represents the purpose of the study. However, sometimes using the finding of a study as a title can be very attractive, like a novel method, a novel medium and, etc.

In my opinion, the title of the article does not determine whether the reader will continue reading the paper or not. The abstract is very determinative in this regard. A professional researcher considers all the documents found in the search at least in abstract when studying on a subject.

In my opinion, it is a sentence in which there are keywords.

Dear Professor Arzani

I think there is no simple answer, because all titles are in competition for reader attention. At the first glance the title should be attractive enough to make the reader want to read the abstract. Also, the title should ideally convey the novelty, advance, difference, or benefit of the work versus actual knowledge.