A Theory of Everything is a fantasy of the uneducated. We do not even know what everything is. We do not know where we come from, where we are going, nor where we are. we in fact do not know what anything is.

A few decades ago, our brain washed physicists and mathematicians claimed to have discovered the Theory of Everything, supposedly composed of Schrödinger's equation combined with Einstein's theories of relativity.

At the time, smart people almost laughed at the combination of several elements of the Theory of Everything, when it should be a single thing or a single law.

Second, how can two incomplete and misleading laws, such as Einstein's relativity and Schrödinger's quantum mechanics, be combined to form a complete or perfect theory? On the other hand,

if we could gather and synthesize all the well-established laws of universal physics into a single sentence, it would constitute the much-sought-after Theory of Everything, the subject of this article.

Today, the claims of the deluded scientists have become a joke, as the true Theory of Everything has been discovered, presented, explained, and successfully applied over the past five years under the name "Cairo Statistical Techniques." Surprisingly, each physical situation corresponds to a presupposed value of the input elements of the main diagonal RO of the transition matrix derived from the statistical theory of Cairo techniques.

This means that the appropriate choice of the input diagonal element is the key solution for Cairo techniques using chains of transition matrices B. In this article, we show how Cairo statistical techniques can solve several illustrative applications in almost all areas of physics and mathematics, including:

1- Laplace and Poisson PDEs.

2- Solution of the classical heat diffusion and conduction problem in its most general form.

3- Derive famous statistical laws such as the Gaussian or normal distribution law.

4- Solve problems with the Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics in 1D, 2D, and 3D.

5- Derive and explain Einstein's theories of special and general relativity, which are more correct and complete than those of Einstein in 1915.

6- How the formation and explosion of the Black Bang occurred millions of years ago. ..etc. But this bad joke continues to be spread every month or week by big names like NASA, Fermi, CNRS, etc., deceiving and misleading our younger generation.

We demand that they do something useful, or simply stop.

@Ismail, why did you reply to your own question with the exact same copy/paste of the same question?

How about three body problem, Ismail?

@ eugene f kislyakov, I like your approach.

Ismail, why don't you write papers instead of using this forum?

Everything and nothing is the same.

“…We do not even know what everything is. We do not know where we come from, where we are going, nor where we are. we in fact do not know what anything is. ….”

- yeah, really the above is quite correct in mainstream philosophy and sciences, including physics, where fundamental phenomena/notions first of all in this case “Matter”, “Consciousness”, “Space”, “Time”, “Energy”, “Information”, are fundamentally transcendent/uncertain/irrational.

However really that isn’t correct, the phenomena/notions above are really rigorously scientifically defined in the Shevchenko-Tokarevsky’s really philosophical 2007 “The Information as Absolute” conception, recent version of the basic paper see in

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363645560_The_Information_as_Absolute_-_2022_ed

That is another thing, that the conception officially - and essentially really, though, is unknown in the scientific community, since well more a ten submissions of corresponding papers were rejected by conventional philosophical journals editors, and any information about the conception is blocked everywhere that is possible; since the authors are “incorrect”, while this really fundamental breakthrough in philosophy, which transforms a numerous set of really having no any relation to real science “branches”, schools, theories, etc. “[mainstream] philosophy” into real science, must have “correct” authors.

In the conception it is rigorously proven that there exist nothing else than some informational patterns/systems of the patterns that are elements of the absolutely fundamental and absolutely infinite “Information” Set. The Set exists absolutely objectively, because of it fundamentally – logically - cannot be non-existent; and so exists absolutely eternally, having no Beginning and no End;

- while the utmost general scientifically rigorous definition of the so absolutely fundamental phenomenon/notion “Information” is:

“Information is something that is constructed in accordance with the set/system of absolutely fundamental Rules, Possibilities, Quantities, etc. – the set/system “Logos” in the conception”

Including “Matter” and “Consciousness” [what resides in humans’ ptactically material bodies and really is just “we”] are the Set’s elements, which are fundamentally different informational systems, and so exist and evolve/operate in fundamentally different spaces, but the consciousnesses, say, can understand correctly something in matter since both are made from the same stuff “information”.

All living beings have some consciousnesses, just only this differs life from anything else, “We” , i.e. humans consciousnesses, till now are going along the development trend from primary bioforms consciousnesses to “homo-two sapiens” consciousness version “more and more outside Matter in the Set”, etc.

The trend proceeds till now completely unconsciously instinctively by trial and error way, including of the human’s consciousness, however this cosnsciousness version is developed up to state when the development can be consciously controlled – however that could be only basing on the conception above and so provided that the conception would be widely known.

More see the link above, the post relates to really fundamental and complex problems, so let hope more will be in next SS posts here.

Cheers