I'm working on move analysis and would appreciate if I can get your views on interrater process in analyzing text. The text analyzed is from engineering discipline so a 2nd rater with engineering expertise is needed to ensure the rating by the 1st rater who is a linguist interprets the text correctly.

Is it sufficient for the 2nd rater to interrate only half of the samples scripts instead of all the scripts. Reason given is to establish consistency in the 1st rater analysis to enable the 1st rater to conduct independent rating to the rest of the scripts.

It is understood that the interrater process is usually used to derive similarity index between two raters for reliability purpose and in medical area especially, interrater involves the whole sample. Would appreciate your views on using selective samples for interrater process in establishing consistency in 1st rater independent rating.

The idea to interrate only a small number instead of all the scripts is upon reflection on the practice in using 2nd rater for on exam script marking. The 2nd rating is done on a small number of the scripts rather than the whole exam paper as the purpose is to establish consistency in the 1st rater rating rather than checking on the similarity between the two markers.

Similar questions and discussions