Research objectives:
1.To examine the nature and strength of relationship between:
a. Connectedness to nature and subjective well-being.
b. Connectedness to nature and environmental identity.
c. Connectedness to nature and pro-environmental behavior
d. Environmental identity and subjective well-being.
e. Environmental identity and pro-environmental behavior.
2. Connectedness to nature and environmental identity as predictors of subjective well-being and pro-environmental behavior.
All my variables are interval in nature (they are basically test scores)
For the first research objective I intend to use pearson correlation coefficient.
For the second I intend to use multivariate multiple regression ( because 2 predictors and 2 criterions ).
Why I am again doing regression after already finding out the strength and direction of relationship between the variables?
Because I want to know which is a better predictor of subjective well-being and pro-environmental behavior.
Am I being practical about this? Is the second research objective pointless? Is it simply making the problem more cumbersome and making me appear like an illogical researcher?
Do I just exclude the second research objective?
Any help from fellow researchgate members would be greatly appreciated!