Yes you can. I agree with Ashkan.

Yes, regards.

yes . why not ?

Well in my opinion, there is no need to apply quantum mechanics to sociology. Quantum mechanics is physics which incorporates elements of statistics (e.g. probabilities, averages, prob. distributions, Gaussian functions etc.) to explain the stochatic nature of subatomic particles that exhibit wave -like and particle like behavior. Aspects of sociology may vary in a random and unpredictable sense and can show various "states" of being. However, sociology does not show wave-like trends or mathematical descriptions in vector spaces as in QM nor does it adhere to laws such as the uncertainty principle et. al the Pauli exclusion principle. Therefore, in reference to aspects that can be quantized in sociology, traditional statistics will suffice. Lastly, a philosophical view of sociology which incoporates the notions of quantum mechanics are correct on a figurative basis, but cannot literally or directly be applied.

Dear Ashkan,

I agree with you 100% about the philosophies of sociology and quantum mechanics having the ability to coalesce. Your point is well taken, I just wanted to clarify the literal use of quantum mechanics in sociology although it is indeed implicit that the two are incompatible. As I stated in the conclusion of my comment, philosophical Notions in sociology that incorporate Notions from quantum mechanics are indeed correct in support of what you have stated.

Best,

Edward

What attracts you are the most unfounded and folkloric aspects of the quantic physics (by a sect who became hegemonic by the well-targeted killings of the two competitors, ninety years ago). The only aspects that are popularized.

Just compare with the Nobel lecture of P.A.M. Dirac.

@Lavau

Names please and quantify what you mean with folkloristic aspects: what are the folkloristic aspects? Chemistry is fully based on Quantum Mechanics: is that folklore?

Chemistry is fully based on the equations of Schrödinger and Pauli, modernized by P.A.M. Dirac. Solid state physics too.

On that, the SEMANTICS taught by the Göttingen-København pack and their heirs walks on the head, and is purely parasitic. You are fooled because it is hegemonically taught.

mr Lavau

Instead of (meaningless) words provide physical arguments why we should not use the Copenhagen / Born interpreatation to understand chemical bond

Already fully published...

Article Fifteen surreptitious, copenhaguist and corpuscularist postu...

for instance.

So many technical and scientific experimental evidences they have to hide to the students, and to avoid, because they are incompatible with their postulates...

The sociology and the psychosociology or the ethnopsychiatry have enough methods by themselves. Not any need to cloak with imported and weird folklore.

In sociology, the Newtonian macro-time is valid. In microphysics, it is not.

In microphysics, the intrinsic frequencies play the main role, and govern the wavelengths.

Exercise :

Knowing that the mass of the proton is 1.67265 . 10-27 kg, deduct its intrinsic de Broglie frequency.

We accelerate it under a potential difference of 500 V. Calculate its wavelength in the frame of the laboratory.

Compare this wavelength to some known inter-atomic distances, for instance in aluminum, 286 pm.

Same questions with a bullet for an assault rifle, weighing 5 g: its broglian frequency as a bulk, then its wavelength in the frame of the laboratory, when its speed is 800 m/s.

How will you mount the experiment to show up and measure this wavelength?

The key is in Annex H.

So it will be evident to you that the mechanics is undulatory in practice only for minimal masses: electrons, protons, neutrons, etc.

Did you hear Mr. Tompkins Explores the Atom where he was told that for killing the quantic tiger, one should shoot many bullets in all directions? Or were you thrust that as owing to Richard Feynman “Nobody understands Quantum Mechanics”, so you should not dare to understand better than him? Or that the mysteries of the Holy Duality are so damned subtle, that only damned math-minded initiates can master it? Or that an electron in a cathodic ray-tube takes the time “to explore beyond planet Jupiter”? So much considering that the cat “is” simultaneously dead and alive, and that the submarine “is” in a superposed state between two miles further west and two miles further east, and maybe further north and further south… With so conceptual blurring, no wonder that charlatans praise their quacks medicine, but “quantic huh!”: they were given all facilities to fool you so.

It was enough with these rags and blunders...

OK but how does this explain the chemical bond in molecules?

Even the smallest the Hydrogen H2?

What do you reproach to the equations mentionned above ?

Of course there are still theses on better methods of numerical calculus of the molecules.

They are waves equations.

Thank you all so much for sharing your views and expertise. Folklore apart, let me try to rephrase my initial question as: is there any specific quantum equation / formal model that could be implemented to describe the nature of the social bond?

Where could you find any common property, even mathematical, between the empirical laws of psycho-sociology, and the undulatory equations of the microphysics?

Where in the field of social sciences will you find the correspondent of the de Broglie intrinsic frequency mc²/h ? Where the correspondent of the Dirac-Schrödinger frequency 2mc²/h ?

The quack-doctors too are fond of the magical fuzziness of the Göttingen-København folklore.

Yes indeed. Please check out this: Conference Paper Quantum Mechanics (QM) as the basis for Societal Mechanics (SM)

You may also visit this link( http://www.asatheory.org/current-newsletter-online/book-review-quantum-mind-and-social-science) to see how it is applied and other possible researches involving quantum mechanical principles.