The sorting out of the devastating earthquake has catastrophic economic, social and political effects on the Syrian economy and society, which is already suffering from a devastating war for more than 12 years. All of this creates new economic and social behaviors and practices, represented in dependence on aid, theft of aid, trading in aid, chronic unemployment, and runaway inflation. All of the above will produce a new Syrian political economy, I think. The question is, can this case not be called the political economy of the earthquake?
yes you can do a survey on the behavior of the surviving inhabitants after the earthquake, emphasizing the psychological side.
After the earthquake, the suffering of the Syrian people will increase. Western countries that do not make efforts to prevent war will continue to think about how to increase their own interests due to the earthquake.
الاقتصاد السياسي للأزمات كتراكم معرفي كان ولا يزال يؤطر الفكر الاقتصادي لكن حاليا وفي ظل التغيرات الجيوسياسية والإقتصادية بات لزاما على الدول ان تحدد لنفسها مقاربة جديدة لنظامها السياسي والاقتصادي تستند على قدراتها ومواردها من منطلق اعمل محليا وفكر عالميا
يجب تشخيص الازمة السورية من منطلق كونها ازمة سياسية قبل ان تكون اقتصادية وبالتالي الحلول السياسية كفيلة باعادة تشغيل العجلة الاقتصادية والخروج من الازمة ...في وقت قد يكون فيه الزلزال مجرد عامل ضغط لا اكثر
yes, earthquakes damages infrastructure and as such the process of rehabilitating and rebuilding requires economic intervention.
Thank you very much to all of you for responding. All I hope is that we work on an organized paper that explains the political economy of disasters (earthquakes as an example).