Yes you can. If it is correct or not that is another story. You can put more than one corresponding author in an article. I have one article with two corresponding authors and I saw other articles in the same situation. Just include in the file of manuscript when listing the authors the asterisk in both corresponding authors and them put below the information of both of them (Phone, email etc).
No, because it is THE corresponding author. All the other co-authors have been let off doing secretarial work and are busy back at their research.
It is very common to include the E-mail address of all co-authors.
If there is no corresponding author tagged, then you are free to contact any of the authors (people will usually try the first-mentioned author first).
Yes you can. If it is correct or not that is another story. You can put more than one corresponding author in an article. I have one article with two corresponding authors and I saw other articles in the same situation. Just include in the file of manuscript when listing the authors the asterisk in both corresponding authors and them put below the information of both of them (Phone, email etc).
Hi, of course, shared corresponding authorship is accepted by some journals. See f.e. here:
Haschemi, A., P. Kosma, et al. (2012). "The sedoheptulose kinase CARKL directs macrophage polarization through control of glucose metabolism." Cell Metab 15(6): 813-826. (Shared corresponding authors: Haschemi A, Pospisilik AJ)
Yes, it is possible and the decision relay on the editor of the journal. There are not ethical issues. I did it a couple of times and will continue if necessary. It may happens the research to be published requires the blend of different technical field of expertise. Also, principal investigators can bring funding from different sources seeking the technical solutions. The most important, however, is that the corresponding authors may had brainstormed as a team sharing equal credits for the intellectual contribution. Readers can contact one or both authors depending on the area of interest. Not giving this possibility will reduce team-working. Bottom line, explain your reasons to the editor when submitting your share article. Cheers!
Hi Subrata, it depends on a) whether the journal offers the feature of shared contributorships and b) how the submission process is designed.
In most journals, the person who submits the manuscript by an online managing system (and thus communicates with the journal) is not necessarily the one who is the declared corresponding author. That means, that - when you enter all the co-authors in the online-tool - you can assign persons to the function "corresponding author", irrespective of whether this person communicates with the journal or not. However, the term "corresponding author" is quite historical; it just means, that the author bears responsibility for all communication dealing with this paper since he or she is the most experienced and senior person among all co-authors.
The corresponding author, as for my personal knowledge regarding the Romanian situation, is in most cases, I would say, the person who has done the most work, or the one who "owns" the project. One also has to weigh in the intellectual work behind the project as a whole and from that perspective the person who has done the work, perhaps a detail in a much bigger perspective, may not be the appropriate person for details although that person has done most of the work for the paper in question. So in some cases the question is definitely harder to answer. Not being corresponding author, does not necessarily detract much from being first author.
In my experience the corresponding author is not always the person that has done most of the work. In a lot of cases, the corresponding author is the person with time communicate with the editors and sort questions among co-authors. Having one or various corresponding authors may varied from discipline, editorial requirements, volume of correspondence expected, division of work (in some articles co-authors clearly define their roles as theoretical or methodological experts) or authors' preference. An interesting article regarding corresponding authors is Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Dobránszki, J., Thanh Van, P. & Payne, W. a. (2012) Corresponding authors: Rules, responsibilities and risks", The Asian and Australasian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology (http://www.globalsciencebooks.info/JournalsSup/images/2013/AAJPSB_7(SI1)/AAJPSB_7(SI1)16-20o.pdf)
In my (limited) experience, the first author who is typically the submitting author is automatically designated as the corresponding author in the process of communicating with the journal in terms of submission, revisions, and production issues. But as some have pointed out above, the corresponding author listed on a published article has a different purpose, namely that if any reader wants to contact the group with questions, interviews, request additional resources alluded to in the publication, etc. they should write to the corresponding author. So, the corresponding author needs to be someone who is completely knowledgeable about the content of the article and can answer any questions that may arise.
The reason that we listed two corresponding authors on my recent articles is because while I was the first and submitting author, I do not necessarily anticipate being with my current institution long-term (this is not uncommon for graduate students, postdocs, and other early-career researchers), so I listed both myself and the PI as the corresponding authors so if I am not around when the reader wants to contact me they can contact the PI.
you can have two , but the norm and practicality of having one CR author will facilitate quick responses to reviewers, editors, gallery proof reading. otherwise each one will depend on the other.
Verily, adding more than one corresponding author to a particular article does not hold true. A manuscript should have one corresponding author but the email address can be more than one. So Omid you are right
For sure there are many articles, even in top journals, which have two corresponding authors.
The Important question here would be, whether is it normal/ ethical practice or are there any specific rules/ guidelines written somewhere on this issue?
It sounds quite strange dear researcher . But then 1&2 corresponding authors may be maintained provided that journal have the provision. Any of them can do the task and then transmit the information of corrections to other co-authors as well before final submission of revision. In this kind of situation, the chief editor must be written to comply with the journal guidelines for authors.
''Is it possible to add more than one corresponding author to an article?'' It is possible, but, in my opinion, it is not correct. Unless the percentage contribution for this specific activity is shown clearly in the article, regarding cases with more than one corresponding authors. It is a matter of ethics.
My own opinion here is that the corresponding author should be one only. Why? Looking at the authors' guidelines of almost all the journals, you realize that they specifically mention corresponding author not "authors" hence it is only right to use a single corresponding author.
The concept of corresponding author is not only for communicating purpose. One or more authors who have conveyed the basic idea, formulated and planned the research work can be corresponding author. In today's, multidisciplinary work, multiple brains could initiate an idea, and formulate an article. Even students can also be the corresponding author, if the entire concept belongs to them..
The concept of corresponding author is misinterpreted of only being for communicating purpose.
Yes you can. You can put more than one corresponding author in an article, but you must include the details for each author for ex. (phone, email, etc).
yes, it is possible. although, the manuscript has to be uploaded from the email account of any one. Two or more corresponding persons should be designated within manuscript
" While some journals allow the practice of including two contact authors or corresponding authors, many journals do not. In your case, having two corresponding authors is a requirement for your paper. If you submit the manuscript with one corresponding author and explain in the paper or cover letter that you need to have two, you cannot really be sure whether the journal will allow this. If the journal does not allow, you will have to either go ahead with one corresponding author or withdraw your paper. The withdrawal process might be time-consuming and an additional hassle for you.To avoid this, you can send a pre-submission inquiry to the editor rather than submitting your manuscript. In the email, you can explain why you need two corresponding authors and two first authors, inquire if that is acceptable, and if so, how to submit your paper on the online system. If the editor gives a positive reply, you can go ahead and submit your paper. In case the editor replies that the journal policies do not allow this, you can submit your paper elsewhere directly without having to wait for the withdrawal process to complete. "
While some journals allow the practice of including two contact authors or corresponding authors, many journals do not. In your case, having two corresponding authors is a requirement for your paper. ... If the journal does not allow, you will have to either go ahead with one corresponding author or withdraw your paper
Only mention the information of co-corresponding authors (e.g., email address) is not enough. If your system check the it in the e.g., web if science. You can see there is still only one corresponding author.