In fluid dynamics, the vortices could be observed by placing a ball in it and observing its rotation around vortices center. Is it not amazing to look at stars, planets and moons as balls swimming in the Madun fluid swirls in order to show us how the swirls revolve around its center?
Please, see
"A new alternative theory of gravity where gravity is particles behaving as a fluid forming two types of swirls Annular swirls and oval swirls".
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Figure-3-Conceptual-depict-shows-the-entire-curvature-revolves-together-around-center_fig3_330763968
Ahmad,
How does this improve upon the rather well-established Newtonian model of gravity?
And how does your 'fluid' explain the Cavendish experiment?
Dear James Garry
Newton 's model is an ambiguous, can you imagine what is the force which called gravity, is it for example invisible strings that come out of the planet and hold on the bodies. The "fluid" model can present a "visual" perception for that mysterious force, the ability of this fluid to create pressure on the planet's surface is a wonderful and imaginative interpretation.
this Note is inaccurate.
Ahmad,
There is nothing ambiguous about the Newtonian gravity model.
It predicts very well the force that two masses will experience.
I have performed the Cavendish experiment myself - and I wonder if your model can predict for me the force between two 10kg masses, spaced 20cm apart?
(these was, roughly, the set-up that I used, with a torsion balance holding one mass)
I do not care about visualization.
Does your model make predictions for actual experiments?
> this Note is inaccurate.
In what way?
Dear James Garry
Let's assume that there are two people in front of a closed room, the first said: There is a person in the room.
The second said: John the teacher of physics in the room.
The two men agreed that there was someone in the room, but the second gave us a clearer visualization of the person in the room.
Newton's model of gravity speaking about something that has an impact on subjects, and the fluid model also speaks of something that has an impact on subjects, but it is an added addition, it is providing a visualization of that object.
If the interpretation in physics is not subject to our senses or not subject to our visualization , this is a real dilemma, .
If we abandon our visualization at physics, and limit ourselves to numbers, what is the difference between physics and mathematics?
If we abandon our visualization at physics, what is the difference between these two terms:
1. This is a description of what happened, as if you see it.
2 - This is what happened, and do not ask how it happened.
The Visualization in physics is the soul that gives life to any physical theory.
Ahmad,
If your model cannot predict the outcome of experiments, of what use is it?
So.
Two masses: each of 10kg, 20cm separating their centres.
Shall we see which model gives the closest result to actual values?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Political Science
- International History and Politics
- Globalization