Hi all,
I am writing my academic CV and would like to have a very professional CV. I have a question.
Is it good to separate our peer-reviewed articles by co-author and first/last author in the CV?
Thank you in advance,
Behzad
List all papers that you have written, no matter whether primary or co-author, if there is such a thing
Hello, Behzad Kiani . The most common recommended approach is to list your publications by date, regardless of whether you are first author. Many prefer it to be in reverse chronological order (starting with the most recent).
Wishing you the best.
Brooke Hallowell
If I understand your question well, I would arrange the publication list so that your latest paper is first in line, then going backwards in time. The reason I have done this myself is that me - and most of the other scholars who I know - are more interested in your recent work, rather than old stuff.
I think the best way to list them is to list them in reverse chronological order, i.e. starting with the most recent one and going back. Make a separate category each for peer-reviewed journal articles, peer reviewed conference proceedings, books and book chapters. As a search committee member, I find it very annoying when all scholarly works are lumped into a single category. Unfortunately, some people do that to inflate their achievements.
I think it is better to arrange them separately and according to specific categories such as individual research, books, conferences, etc.
Thank you all. In conclusion, I think it is not professional to categorise our articles by our position in the author list. It is suggested to order them by a reverse choronogical order from the most recent to the oldest one.
Behzad Kiani "very professional CV" from Employer or/and Research Institute point of view means a "focused CV". Reverse chronological order will show the field that you are interested most. If something doesn't fit into position that you want to apply, just delete it from the list. The missing elements will be accessible through your ORCID, RG, ... profiles. That's the way how we are checking the CVs from the "Opposite" side. Good luck!
I think it is always better to list your peer reviewed papers separately in your CV and have them listed in chronological order or vise versa (as you wish). Authorship should be according to the order listed in the publication. You should never change the order of the authorship from what is indicated in the original publication.
CV writing guide
https://www.kilimanjaroyetu.com/search/label/CV%20WRITING%20AND%20GUIDELINES
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Writing