My above question is meant to awake those literature writers, responsible committes, and practicing neurologists, ophthalmogists and neurosugens to stop saying that up to 25 is normal. The harm is clearly losing cases of IH as well as losing vision in young patients.
Any researcher who disagree is wellcome for discussion and my clarification.
I hope responsible committes announce clearly and broadcast that (5 - 25) is no more true or valid for the sake of patients.
I appreciate,
Sorry it's an error
it"s not my field of knowledge
My work is besed on q value asphericity , corneal shape , isovision ; 'optic by dilution '
Respectfully
F HEHN
No problem Mr Henn,
You are alawys welcome for a discussion.
My point of the question is that eg;
Say a young patient whose CSF pressure is 22 should be regarded as normal (5-25). If suffering papilledema, she is in a risk of losing her vision with no action on her csf pressure which is regarded as normal by an inaccurate definition (5-25).
My best regards,
I appreciate Dr Mohan,
For sake of saving vision of patients with papilledema and csf pressure 21. The girl was denied any action by 5 doctors as 21 is normal.
Mine was 24 (normal!!)followed by 5 operations trying to adjust csf pressure and symptoms. This is another problem neurosurgeons are trying to agree on. Things are coming much better in this direction.
Thank you too much doctor.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Medicine
- Epi
- Age Groups
- Children