In rare occasions the investigators mention references in the result section of their manuscript. Is that acceptable, if so how many citations are regarded as normal or acceptable?
I think that if citations are clearly justified and necessary, any critical reader will understand their importance, regardless of the section where they are used. This would depend on the specific nature of the research and the paper reporting it.
I agree with David. If situation demands citations of works can be used in the result section too. Normally we not give citation of works in the Abstract of the papers.
Citation are merely a way to support your point that you put up... irrespective of section in which they are used...
Specifically, Citingle a particular flora in nomenclature means you have consulted that particular flora or work for your studies....
And may be these citations are to be used in results or observations or notes...
Depends on the way in which you want to communicate.... but specific ways do exist for making citations...
____
Best
Danish husain
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Philology
- Classical Philology
- Manuscripts