In academic writing, the discussion section can be compared with recent studies (especially newly published or complementary studies) that are not cited in the literature review, but it is necessary to ensure that these studies are highly relevant to the current study, and the discussion should be standardized and cite their relevance to avoid affecting the integrity of the research background due to the omission of the literature review.

In addition, I am looking for various topics (special issue) cooperation, if you also have this need, you can contact me via email, we will work together.

My email is: [email protected]

Yes, it is academically correct to compare the findings of your study in the discussion section with the results of recent studies, even if those studies were not mentioned in the literature review.

Here’s why:

Acceptable Academic Practice:

• The discussion section is meant to interpret your results, relate them to existing research, and highlight similarities or differences.
• If new studies were published after you completed your literature review, you can still include and cite them in the discussion to provide a more current and relevant analysis.
• This shows that you are up to date with recent developments in your field, which strengthens your academic credibility.

For Further inquiries, please use [email protected]

The literature review provides a research gallery by which research landscapes, through the sting of pragmatic significance, equiponderates the new eyes of research as Marcel Proust Puts it that research is not finding new landscapes but having new eyes.

So, its not a matter of acceptability of the research decorum but the research flexibility to expand or decompose the spectacle of valid research sources.

While the question evokes the ethical alternative consistent with the research decorum, such research measure is not a law, neither is it a theory....