The neurologic examination is a powerful tool for urgent bedside assessment of ICU patients with neurologic or neurosurgical illnesses. Assessing cranial nerve function is one of the most vital components In this context. Testing the pupillary light reflex evaluates the status of the second and third cranial nerves. Automated pupillometers have been developed that provide objective measures of size of the pupil and the responsiveness of the pupil to light (neuropupillary index). Although few studies reveal diagnostic and prognostic usefulness in critically ill patients, none of the studies correct/adjust for interfer and confounding effects by for example sympathomimetic or parasympathomimetic drug effects, interference from ambient light, previous cataract operation, etc.

Isn‘t it much too early to reliably use automated pupillometry for diagnosis and prognosis in daily clinical practice in ICUs?

More Raoul Christian Sutter's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions