The energy fluctuations from the vacuum cause the generation of particle-antiparticle pairs of virtual particles near the event horizon of the black hole. Is “Hawking Radiation” based on adsorption of the antiparticle (or particle with negative energy) by the black hole and do other particle escapes from the black hole in the form of radiation? Shouldn't there be an equal chance that each type of particle (particle and/or antiparticle) is being absorbed by the black hole?
If the black hole would randomly adsorb particles and/or antiparticles (by 50/50 chance) from the virtual particle pairs, the black hole mass would not change.
There is no such thing as a black hole so Hawking radiation is also nonexistent:
http://vixra.org/abs/1409.0072
Dear Aleksei, If one part of a virtual particle pair had negative energy and other had positive energy, the produced energy would be zero, as a result of the virtual particle pair annihilation. Therefore, the energy would not be borrowed from the vacuum to produce the virtual particle pair in this case.
The blackhole actually absorbs the negative mass particle in which event its own mass is reduced hence the blackhole will evaporate. I do not however take blackholes serious, I feel a better theory will get rid of these objects.
In principle, the virtual particle concept is used as a mathematical expression for the mathematical modeling of interactions between particles (quantum field theory). The virtual particles do not have physical meaning and, therefore, do not exist. Consequently, for the Hawking radiation a better interpretation could be based on the quantum tunneling phenomenon without using the virtual particle and negative energy particle concepts. The black hole particles are tunneling out through ablack hole's event horizon and, for that reason, the black hole radiates and losses mass and energy.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Materials Science