I included a few secondary data analyses in my systematic review. As I am filling in my Prisma flow chart, I would like to know if these are considered unique studies. The data and inquiry proposed in these are different than those of the parent study, though the data used to answer the question is from previously done unique studies.
Have look at this paper,
Article Secondary Data Analysis: Ethical Issues and Challenges
https://coresignal.com/blog/secondary-data/
Secondary data analysis is a research method that involves the use of existing data that was collected for a different purpose or by another researcher. While it may involve original research and analysis, secondary data analysis is generally not considered a unique study in the sense that the data being analyzed has already been collected and is not unique to the researcher conducting the analysis.
Instead, secondary data analysis is often used as a way to answer new research questions or test new hypotheses using existing data sources. It can be a valuable method for researchers who want to study a topic that would be difficult or impractical to study using primary data collection methods, or for researchers who want to compare their findings to those of previous studies.
That being said, secondary data analysis still requires careful planning, analysis, and interpretation, and can lead to novel and important findings. Therefore, while it may not be considered a unique study in the traditional sense, it is still a valuable research method that can contribute to the advancement of knowledge in a particular field.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Higher Education
- Universities