Investigative surge for hidden unidentifiable operators of sociology and economies?
Unidentifiable factors are nothing but intrinsically value-based unsurfaced, yet felt dynamics of composite referrals relating to interactively triggered behavior. The scales to measure the magnitude of such repulsive or impulsive signals in exact strength seems impossible. Therefore, all such value-based triggers and the magnitude of related impacts are to be evenly synchronized with the proposed resolution. This would immensely help in formulating solutions to create the best balance between the hyper-reactive/interactive elements of sociology and economics. If disagree, please let me know why?
Dear Shahida Anusha Siddiqui
Far from being familiar with the subject, I wanted to ask you whether the terms "hidden operators" or "unidentifiable factors" refer to the basic, non-demonstrable assumptions of any scientific theory. Some authors place them as the constitutive part of the core of a "blind zone" of any scientific theory. This nucleus of undemonstrable ontological foundations, which provides protection from criticism of its own axioms and principles.
I share with you the article by Molero-Simarro (2010) -link: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-554X2010000100003 -, which addresses this problem, and gives a potential response from the complex sociology of knowledge enunciated by Edgar Morin (1991), and its relevance to the case of social sciences (economics, sociology, etc.). Hopefully it will be useful.
We await further contributions. Greetings and available for any collaboration you may wish to make.
Fernando (From Argentina)
Estimada Shahida
Lejos de ser conocedor del tema, quería consultarte si con los términos “operadores ocultos” o “factores no identificables”, réferis a los presupuestos básicos no-demostrables que posee toda teoría científica. A los que ciertos autores los ubican como la parte constitutiva del núcleo de una "zona ciega" de toda teoría científica. Ese núcleo de fundamentos ontológicos no demostrables, que brinda la protección de críticas sobre sus propios axiomas y principios.
Te comparto el artículo de Molero-Simarro (2010) –link: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-554X2010000100003 –, que aborda esa problemática, y da una potencial respuesta desde la sociología compleja del conocimiento enunciada por Edgar Morin (1991), y su pertinencia para el caso de las ciencias sociales (economía, sociología, etc.). Ojalá pueda ser de utilidad.
Quedamos a espera de otros aportes. Saludos y a disposición en lo que consideres que pueda colaborar.
Fernando (Desde Argentina)
