Interested in ideas on THE CRITICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING IMPOSSIBILITY ZONES?
About expanding the critical problem-solving impossibility zone theory and linking it to why the failure to fix/properly address critical issues like global warming since 1987 WCED.
Sharing abstract of coming paper
Environmental sustainability thinking 103: Using the critical problem-solving impossibility zone theory to point out why anthropocentric led critical development issues such a global warming has not been solved since 1987 and why they should not be expected to be solved if we continue to use non-transition-based market development tools.
Abstract
Irresponsible human led economic behavior has led to a critical pollution production problem affecting irresponsible critical development problem led dynamics in a negative loop frame, which has taken us to a world of non-optimal production, non-optimal consumption and non-optimal population dynamics through time, with increasing unsustainability driving critical issues like global warming. This is the anthropocentric led view of negative economic impacts on critical development problem dynamics, including global warming. The goal of this paper is to link the critical problem-solving impossibility zone theory with this anthropocentric led view to create an anthropocentric led critical problem-solving impossibility zone linked to global warming dynamics and use it to highlight why approaches used to deal with this negative anthropocentric behavior since 1987 to now, namely sustainable development goals(since WCED 1987), dwarf green markets(since UNCSD 2012 Rio + 20), and circular traditional markets(since about 2022), have not worked, and why they should not be expected to fix the pollution production problem associated negatively with the global warming issue.
Critical problem-solving “impossibility zones” arise when complexity exceeds the capacity of traditional tools. The key is to reframe the problem through systems thinking and stakeholder collaboration, turning “impossibility” into innovation opportunities.
Ghadeer, thank you for commenting. What you said is what the picture does? At any point of action within the impossibility from point "a" to point "b" no idea or tool or market or thinking will solve the critical problem at hand as the picture reflects the conjunctural determinism theorem. You will find the paper the full of good food for thoughts and I will share it when published.
Critical problem-solving impossibility zones are spaces where governance, market mechanisms, and technology cannot jointly provide solutions due to structural contradictions (e.g., growth vs ecological limits); recognizing these zones helps identify when incremental reform is insufficient and when transformative change is the only viable route.
Still the AI view misses the true nature and implications of the critical problem solving impossibility zone theory as it probably can not figure out that the arrow impossibility theory breaks in this zone as the choice structure in this zone is different.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Materials Science
- Materials
- Inorganic Materials
- Ceramics
- Glass