Dear Namiq Abbasov,

If you look at what Europe is trying to do, you'll see that we try to work on both axis:

1°) help countries to increase their scientific R&D, to increase their level of knowledge and education and to stimulate the innovation processes, specifically through the development of Centres of Excellence,

2°) help "less advanced" countries to master technologies and scientific R&D and increase their level of knowledge and education through collaboration between research institutions (those of "less advanced" and those of "more advanced") and companies involvement. It's worth noting that "less" or "more" is less a question of ranking than a question of demand.

There are some examples of this kind of collaboration which start giving really good results

Kind regards

Dear Namiq Abbasov,

In my opinion, both methods of innovation development have many positive aspects and can complement each other. I believe that the economically fast developing countries, the development of entrepreneurship and innovation, the development of innovative technologies, products, processes, etc. are based on both methods of innovation development, i.e. on their own, national innovative projects, financed from domestic sources and implemented in enterprises of the commercial sector and public, in research centers and universities, and importing innovative technologies from abroad and investments carried out by foreign innovative technology companies. The relation of the scale of involved financial resources and investments under these two methods of developing innovation in individual countries may vary considerably. However, both methods of innovation development can complement each other and thanks to this, the country's economic development may be more effective and faster.

Best wishes

Dear Namiq Abbasov,

If you look at what Europe is trying to do, you'll see that we try to work on both axis:

1°) help countries to increase their scientific R&D, to increase their level of knowledge and education and to stimulate the innovation processes, specifically through the development of Centres of Excellence,

2°) help "less advanced" countries to master technologies and scientific R&D and increase their level of knowledge and education through collaboration between research institutions (those of "less advanced" and those of "more advanced") and companies involvement. It's worth noting that "less" or "more" is less a question of ranking than a question of demand.

There are some examples of this kind of collaboration which start giving really good results

Kind regards

Dear Daniel Richard,

Can you please name some of the programs in this regard?

Taking the leap: research collaboration as a path to industrial innovation

The productivity-enhancing potentials of the technologies associated with Industry 4.0 are becoming increasingly attractive to manufacturers. But where can a small- or medium sized company go to find out the right path forward? We take a look at the benefits of industry collaboration with research institutions...

https://pacetoday.com.au/taking-leap-research-collaboration-path-industrial-innovation/

Dear Namiq Abbasov,

Sorry for my late answer

You could for example have a look at https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/teaming

This is a short presentation of the Teaming Project in Horizon 2020 Programme that could give you some ideas.

Tell me if you need more information

Kind regards

Daniel

I think the following article will be helpful

Article Innovation and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis for CE...

Best Regards Namiq Abbasov

An interesting issue to carry out comparative studies. Is investing in the independent creation of innovative technologies or their import more important for raising the level of innovation and equipping the country's economy with innovations and technologies? In many countries, both forms of supporting economic development are developed, in which the activation of innovation and the implementation of modern technologies in economic processes are an important factor in this development. However, in individual countries, the relations between these two forms of supporting economic development, in which the activation of innovation and the implementation of modern technologies are not the same and may differ significantly. Therefore, it is an interesting topic for scientific research, for conducting comparative analyzes consisting in collecting data on the activation of innovation and technological development and the impact of these processes on the economic development of the country, collecting this type of data from different countries and conducting a comparative analysis in this respect comparing individual countries with together.

Very few countries think about this. The rest use the terms only

Don’t start with technology. Start with physics. Countries that will lead the future must infuse physics in the population. Physics is not an alien word. It is the story of nature. Countries that teach it well will led. They will generate creative ways to tame nature. And it at that taming stage that we talk of technology.

Dear Colleagues and Friends from RG,

In recent years, in the knowledge-based economies, the importance of innovation is growing both in the effective development of an enterprise and in the context of the development of the entire economy. The dominant opinion is that if the company is not innovative in any way, it may soon be forced out of the market by competitors that are more innovative. On the other hand, resolving the issue of relations between the concepts of innovation and entrepreneurship in a supranational approach is a complex matter. The reason is the uneven definition of the concepts of innovation and entrepreneurship in the context of starting and conducting specific types of economic activity in individual countries.

In some developing countries, pro-development, anti-crisis, anti-cyclical, Keynsian socio-economic policies and prosocial housing policies are currently underway, which are an important determinant of high economic growth and ensuring material and economic well-being for citizens. In individual countries, analogous instruments of state intervention are usually used as part of pro-development, anti-crisis, anti-cyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policy and prosocial housing policy. The instruments of state interventionism also contribute to the activation of innovation and entrepreneurship, reduction of unemployment, increase of investment, income and consumption. In individual countries, analogous instruments of state intervention are usually used, including selected instruments of fiscal, budgetary and monetary policy, however, in a different structure of application of individual instruments and with a different share of their financing from state public funds. In my opinion, the development of innovative technologies and their implementation in the production processes of both consumer and investment products, e.g. prefabricated building and ecological materials, energy innovations is an increasingly important factor in shaping pro-development, anti-crisis, anti-cyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policy, including pro-social housing policy?

In a situation where pro-ecological innovations, including energy innovations, are also developed, including new technologies of renewable energy sources, then the pro-development anti-crisis, Keynesian socio-economic policy obtains additional attributes of modernity that take care of protecting natural environment resources. In connection with the above, activating entrepreneurship and innovation focused on supporting the creation and development of economic entities of the SME sector is currently one of the key problems in improving instruments of state interventionism. Currently, the importance of this issue is growing in the context of the economic slowdown that has been appearing since the end of 2018 in the economies of many countries. Specific instruments of state interventionism, including activating entrepreneurship and innovation of economic entities of the SME sector are recognized in many developed countries as one of the main determinants of effective, pro-development, anti-crisis socio-economic policy.

The importance of this factor in pro-development, anti-crisis socio-economic policy is growing in the context of the depletion of the potential for other interventionist factors, such as maintaining low interest rates and other instruments of monetary policy, and the development of the necessary institutional and economic infrastructure of the business environment. In many countries, the activation of entrepreneurship and innovation focused on supporting the creation and development of economic entities of the SME sector takes into account the key components of fiscal policy, including primarily the reduction of tax categories key for the SME sector and the creation of solutions supporting international trade and promoting the offer of enterprises of the SME sector on the markets of other countries .

However, despite many expenditures incurred for these purposes as part of public finances of the state, the development of entrepreneurship and innovation may be significantly limited in the situation of a rapidly unfavorable economic process of demographic change, i.e. the aging of the society. Therefore, anti-crisis, pro-development, Keynesian socio-economic policies should also take into account prosocial goals, including the need to increase fertility in the demographic structure of society. Demographic processes involving the aging of the society are serious problems of the age of developed countries that limit the possibility of using instruments for activating entrepreneurship and innovation of business entities representing the small and medium-sized enterprises sector.

In connection with the above, it is also important to develop social and economic policy instruments that lead to the improvement of the economic, material and housing situation of the society. Thanks to these solutions, it is possible to improve consumption, which is a key element necessary for the development opportunities of business entities producing products and services to meet the needs of citizens. In line with the above, in my opinion the importance of supporting innovation in order to stimulate economic growth in knowledge-based economies has been growing in recent years. Currently, in developing and developed countries, various instruments of activating innovation are used as part of the pro-development policy of innovation, entrepreneurship, etc., which is a segment of socio-economic policy.

Best wishes.

Dariusz Prokopowicz