Some journals do not accept review papers because they consider that the theoretical framework is the basis of a research, and not the research itself. Other magazines already accept and encourage this type of publication. what do you think about?
Yes they are too important and should be published by all scientific journals.
In the current context Sage, Taylor and Francis etc are also accepting the publication of Reviews. They also contribute towards the development of research.
In particular, I understand that review articles are fundamental for a better understanding of the scientific aspects of a given area of knowledge.
Some of the important journals in the world value this kind of papers... Because, it present the state of art of the knowledge...
yes , i agree with you Viníciu Fagundes Bárbara Literature review articles important and should they be published by scientific journals .
I also understand that revision works are important and fundamental for the advancement of science.
I agree that review articles are important for the reasons outlined above. However, the real benefit comes from the discussion section where future work and knowledge gaps are presented.
I think review articles are very essential in disseminating info on topics and aspects considered trending/relevant to current issues. I also think it is unethical not to publish them. I have done a review myself and I think the effort paid in compiling published work, reading and understanding a review is equally as much as a research paper based on empirical evidence
I fully agree with you! Review articles are as important as traditional research papers. I am a review enthusiast and I always advise students in this area as well.
Of course. They are very useful for other researchers. A bibliographic review allows to know the state of the art in any field. In addition, the author's particular point of view, his hermeneutical analysis may represent a disruptive change in science in the field of study.
I believe that systematic review articles are valuable and should be published as long as their argumentation makes explicit the progress of a research topic or program, generating an important map of the gaps that must be filled or lead to a leap towards new applications or new research.
Los artículos de revisión tienen un gran valor abordados desde la epistemología, pues se desnuda las categorías ontológicas, gnoseológicas y axiológicas del conocimiento que se esta indagando, con ello el investigador hace su argumentación científica en términos de continuidad, complementariedad o ruptura teórica, dando también cabida a descubrir vacíos epistémicos, procurando subsanar los mismos. También se pueden generar aportes si decida hacer una ruptura, y con ello sentar las bases para la construcción de una nueva teoría. De allí que, definitivamente los artículos de revisión tienen un gran valor y da pesar que se confunda con un marco teórico, pues son dos aspectos totalmente diferentes en publicaciones científicas.
Viníciu Fagundes Bárbara Yes I agree that the systemic review is very important to the researcher as very truly said by Ilya Casanova apart of this the review paper can clarify the state of knowledge, explain apparent contradictions, identify needed research.
Yes. They are important, especially in providing information on sound literature review
Yes. Review articles have value because someone already took the time to look at what has been done, what remains to be done, what the unanswered questions are, and so on. Review articles that are most recent would be the most helpful especially in the rapidly changing scientific fields.
Yes they are too important and should be published by all scientific journals.
In the current context Sage, Taylor and Francis etc are also accepting the publication of Reviews. They also contribute towards the development of research.
In Colombia, there are three types of research articles that are published in high quality journals: articles based on empirical research, state of the art articles and topic review articles. The last two types of articles are based on bibliographic reviews. Consequently, the answer to Viniciu´s question is yes they are important to be published in journals.
Thank you, Nasir Ahmad Ganaie and Jesus Alirio Bastidas ! I agree!
Reviews are mainly important doing faster the first approach to new topics. However, it is true that some journals more and more discourage their publication, unless they raise critical points of view proposing new avenues of development in the topic.
Yes these are important to published because for young researchers it will be helpful to encourage their work and help them for doing more research
Thank you, Luis Alejandro Galeano and Pragati Singh ! I agree!
Gracias por esta importante reflexión. Particularmente, considero que los artículos de revisión sí son importantes. En este sentido, las revisiones deben partir de una buena pregunta de investigación, debidamente sustentada y justificada. Claro está, es necesario que la revisión siga criterios metodológicos rigurosos. Hoy en día existen métodos como PRISMA que contribuyen con la rigurosidad metodológica en las revisiones sistemáticas.
Muchas gracias, Dayra Elizabeth Ojeda Rosero ! Es verdad! Estoy de acuerdo contigo!
Viníciu Fagundes Bárbara
Dayra Elizabeth Ojeda Rosero
Pragati Singh
Luis Alejandro Galeano
Nasir Ahmad Ganaie
I do agree with your concern that bibliographic review articles important and should they be published by scientific journals.
There needs to be some criteria for that in order for quality control.
Yes, review paper is important & review paper gather a lots od information sucj like as book. so, it is important in research sector.
I think, Yes they should accept review papers, because it will reflect on the quality of the research and the knowledge in general. It is a value added.
Yes! it must be recent, objective, relevance to research!
Yes, because A bibliographical review is a review article in itself, which can be published as such in scientific journals.
Have a look on this
https://retractionwatch.com/2020/09/08/covid-19-arrived-on-a-meteorite-claims-elsevier-book-chapter/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065266020300110?via%3Dihub
These types of papers are accepted but if someone doing meaningful work it's got rejected by journal editors
I think, no. because bibliographic review articles consider only overview, there is no theoretical framework research, thus, it should not be published by scientific journals.
Review articles are important in that they provide the foundation to understand
developing research in that area.
Sin lugar a duda los artículos de revisión constituyen un aporte a la construcción y difusión del conocimiento.
Yes, it is really important since it helps to have a critical overview of the current state of knowledge on a research topic.
I prefer meta-analysis but highly thought synthesis of research is very important
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publisher