Leading inquiry question: How could a pilot project of teaching ecopedagogy at the university level, inform a narrative inquiry into the barriers of normalizing this type of radically critical pedagogy within our institutions of education? This particular inquiry question gets to the heart of a fundamental societal organizing issue: What is the purpose of education? The topic area and context of this inquiry is institutionalized education, and even more specifically, the university education of teachers, leaders, and future citizens of the Earth. It is my intention that this inquiry would lead to a dissertation that would influence the influencers (e.g., teachers and leaders).

This proposed inquiry has emerged within the context of my work as a university adjunct instructor. This particular context is chosen on the premise that a sustainable future is going to require that we ‘teach our teachers to teach’ in an ecologically literate manner, as well as to be ecological. With this inquiry, I’m entering into the vital debate about: Should environmental education (e.g., ‘sustainability’) be taught as a subtopic, an ‘optional’ course of study, or should it be taught as the basis of all other learning?

This developing inquiry also leads to the following sub-questions: What are the barriers to normalizing ecopedagogy within the academy? How can the academy become vested in ecopedagogy and not completely abandon academic freedom? In the face of our ‘wicked problems’ (e.g., ecological crises, mass extinction, climate change, social injustice, etc.), how can the academy fully embrace an ecopedagogy and find a new balance of what academic freedom means in the Anthropocence? In the face of becoming extinct, what constitutes a relevant education?

Similar questions and discussions