Until very recently, the idea of knowledge-related cultures had little currency.
Knowledge creation seemed a matter of rational, cognitive, and technical procedures
undertaken by scientists; it neither needed nor did it lend itself well to cultural or any
other kind of social scientific investigation. Traditionally, philosophy had taken it
upon itself to explore the methods of science, but philosophy being philosophy was
not interested in the empirical question of how knowledge was produced. The
assumption of the unity and universality of science that had emerged since the
time of the Vienna Circle of philosophers contributed to the division between
knowledge and culture. If there was only one scientific method and one knowledge,
how could the notion of culture apply to science?
It would not be possible to develop certain types etc of knowledge, because the culture is not conducive to this. for example, culture does not permit certain prerequisites like certain experiences. Culture also shapes perspective, focus and outlook - philosophy.
Certain knowledge requires certain philosophies and experiences
Two important area of knowledge research are:
1. Science
2. Mathematics (Logic).
Dear Brian
dear Denis
The view that claims philosophy to be a purely theoretical matter is not supported by the history of philosophy. Pierre Hadot, Voelcke, Dománskiand others have borne out philosophy's nature as a precept for life in the history of European philosophy. Interkulturel means CAN be epiphenomenologized to prove the facticities of at least some of Macropolitical intentionalities. With the emergence of Christianity philosophy was pushed back as an independent way of life, since the Christian religion would not accord another way of life a status as equally beatifying and redeeming.BUT, what about those energetics that remain refractory to current Kapitalismus' multiplicities of Naturwissenschaften of semi-structural non"causality ???
Honesty, the ability to validate findings easily, relevant discourse of the issue(s) at hand, delivered in a manner that is completely absent of ad hominem and personal bias(es). Such an existence would demand intentional, static flight from ego. Finally, it could only thrive in an atmosphere of comradery, equality, and goodwill toward others.
Dear Lori
Dear Brian
The qualifications for success in today's ever-changing world will demand that :Most emotions have an intentional structure: we shall need to say something about what that means.Intentionality does generally not go without “bias” / even though in its non-formalistic [re-]presentation.Any localization of Socius Arch-Information modalities turn on their own hidden axiomatization of repeating differences… Would you both be affable enough , Plzz , to opine on this critical issue ??
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Philosophy