I have two sets of graphs one produced straight from the raw data and one processed first to standardise the units. For most of the data both sets give the same results expect for one bit where they contradict each other. Which set of graphs should I base my calculations on and disscuss to draw my conclusion?
Dear Alex:
It nessary is a result of the data aproximations during the standisation. As a consecuence could be prefered raw data graph, but that depends of the final resulta you are searching. Maybe you could simulate de behavior of both grahs according the use for which you are elaborating graphs to make a final decision.
Best wishes,
José Arzola
Alex -
I agree with Jose that my instinct would be to go with raw data graphs rather than ones that have been manipulated.
But it would be best if you could show the two graphs in question, if possible, so that the specific situation you are examining might be discussed.
Cheers - Jim
PS - My preference for raw data, however, does not extend to cases where such data are not directly comparable. For example, to compare residential electric consumption in California to that in Maryland, you might want to use, say, per capita consumption.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematical Sciences
- Graphs