what does this it meant for a frame function to be self ad-joint or regular for instance

Is this some kind of bijective involution roughly; can it in non quantum terms be read as equal to its own inverse F(x)=F-1(x) or F(F(x)=x, an involution function.? AN odd involution function with F(-x)+F(x)=0

and how does this differ from symmetry in quantum probability is this just odd-ness, or an orthogonally involution.

Moreover when Gleason suggested that the frame function must have unit trace, does this correspond to the W that each set of orthogonal triples must sum to F(x1)+F(x2)+F(x3)=W=1

I presume that regular was just word used to denote the end result of the proof thatthe frame function was identical to given by  the born rule or that its linear, a restriction to the two dimensional coordinate of quadratic form.  Please see attached, My model satisfies

The two frame functions conditions with F a positive definitem injection with F strictly monotone increasing,F(0)=0, F(1)=1,

F:[0,1]\to[0,1] F(0)=0, 

\forallx\in dom(F)[0,1] 1>x >0.

F(1)=1, F(1/3)=1/3,F(2/3)=2/3

F(1/2)=1/2,F(1)=1 \forall nin{1,24)F(n/24)=n/24

strictly montone increasing F(0)=0,

\forall n F(n/48)=n/48

and other \forall 1>x >;12

x1+x2+x12

x+y+z+m+x51

x+y+z+x4+x52

x+y+z

More William Balthes's questions See All