While the classical, wavelike behavior of light interference and diffraction has been easily observed in undergraduate laboratories for many years, explicit observation of the quantum nature of light i.e., photons is much more difficult. For example, while well-known phenomena such as the photoelectric effect and Compton scattering strongly suggest the existence of photons, they are not definitive proof of their existence.
In particle physics, quantum field theories such as the Standard Model describe nature in terms of fields. Each field has a complementary description as the set of particles of a particular type. A force between two particles can be described either as the action of a force field generated by one particle on the other, or in terms of the exchange of virtual force carrier particles between them. The energy of a wave in a field (for example, electromagnetic waves in the electromagnetic field) is quantized, and the quantum excitation of the field can be interpreted as particles. In quantum electrodynamics (QED) a charged particle emits exchange force particles continuously. This process has no effect on the properties of a charged particle such as its mass and charge. How is it explainable? In theoretically a pure steady state spin current without charge current can induce an electric field. If a charged particle as a generator has an output known as a virtual photon, what will be its input?
In quantum mechanics, we can't explain virtual photon without uncertainly principle. All quantum field theories integrate over all eventualities that are consistent with uncertainly principle. Thus virtual particles are deeply embedded into the theory. Energy conservation, while important, is simply a time-averaged approximation of a more fundamental underlying physics.
I have no problem with the uncertainty principle.
Because many phenomena in quantum mechanics can be explained by the uncertainty principle. But there are many phenomena that I had to explain to them, regardless of the uncertainty principle explain them.
For example, the Friedmann equation cannot explain the Big Bang. But it can be explained by looking at the sub quantum level.
About concept of particle
Generally, we have almost the same understanding and imagination of large objects (at the level of molecules and larger). But in the case of subatomic particles, there is no clearly defined and visualized concept, and there are many uncertainties, especially in the case of photon and graviton. Therefore, any theory offers certain understanding (such as loop and string) of these particles. In discussion with my dear friend Daniel, I enjoyed his imagination. He wrote; "...since I consider gravity to be a localized phenomenon with rapid attenuation and to be a space deformation like the rubber sheet of Einstein, I maintain that gravitons are not particles -- indeed, I believe all bosons are a wavelike field phenomena. Even Higgs never proposed a Higgs particle -- he proposed the Higgs Field that "clusters" many wavelets to a denser state. He was a Field Theorist as I am. To me all is field and condensed energy moving wavelets at different frequencies."
However, I am using the particles for graviton and photon without any imagination of them.
I have started my research of relativistic Newton's second law, then I found that we should reconsidering the relativistic Newton's second law. Please see
http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays/View/5518
In my opinion force and energy are convertible to each other.
In general, I developed the limit of speed from electromagnetic energy to matter.
@ Aleksei
I know we are talking in quantum area that is diffrent of classical mechanics.
It does not depent on what I whant, it depends to quantum mechanichs unanswered problems.
The Standard Model of particle physics is at a pivotal moment in its history: it is both at the height of its success and on the verge of being surpassed. Also there are many reasons for extending the Standard Model. For example: there is very good evidence that in the first fraction of a second of the big bang the universe went through a stage of extremely rapid expansion called inflation. The fields responsible for inflation cannot be Standard Model ones, and more problems. (1)
In addition to the above problems that quantum mechanics is involved with, let me add that point particles and unstructured photon are also not acceptable to me.
The uncertainty principle is certainly one of the most famous and important aspects of quantum mechanics. The notion of "uncertainty" occurs in several different meanings in the physical literature. It may refer to the lack of knowledge of a quantity by an observer, or to the experimental inaccuracy with which a quantity is measured, or to some ambiguity in the definition of a quantity, or to a statistical spread in an ensemble of similarly prepared systems.
Let's take a different look at some physical phenomena and to review the results of the uncertainty principle. As long as you think like the past, you will get the same results that you've already earned, Feynman said.
(1) G. Kane, “The dawn of physics beyond the standard model”, Scientific American, vol. 288(6), p.68-75, 2003.
Dear Mohamed
Please read question again. how is mechanism of production virtual photon by charged particles? If a charged particle as a generator has an output known as a virtual photon, what will be its input?
Dear Mohame
Thank you very much.
I knew it very years ego. I am looking beyond of this concepts.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Particle Physics