The proposition of claiming Greek godhood over temporal consequence modification is conceptually intriguing but requires careful philosophical and scientific framing. Greek mythology and theology are metaphorical systems that have not traditionally included posthumous human self-deification as a formal category. Thus, the claim can be interpreted as a symbolic or speculative gesture rather than a literal assertion.

From a scientific perspective, the idea of "temporal consequence modification"—including entropy reversal—is highly constrained by the second law of thermodynamics. While local, small-scale entropy manipulations have been demonstrated experimentally, macroscopic and practical reversals remain hypothetical and largely theoretical (e.g., references on Maxwell’s demon and quantum information theory). Therefore, claims of macroscopic entropy reversal require rigorous empirical evidence to move beyond speculation.

Regarding the record of police reports filed past statutes of limitations, this claim is measurable in principle and can be verified through public or institutional data. If the intention is to highlight systemic issues in legal responsiveness, it might be more effective to frame this as a critique of bureaucratic constraints and access to justice, rather than as a personal record claim.

Finally, while speculative claims about posthumous godhood are philosophically interesting, they are better suited for thought experiments, literary frameworks, or ethical discourse rather than as testable research claims. Integrating these ideas into a discussion on social justice, restorative justice frameworks, and systemic accountability could provide a more rigorous and academically grounded contribution

Zein Al-Abideen Douba Now I claim posthumous Greek godhood over all time travel. Preprint Synthesizing Quantum Entanglement, Neopagan Deification, and...