The SLR paper that i submitted, the reviewers said that I just reiterated my results in discussion section. What else should i write besides comparing my finings with other similar and dissimilar studies.
When writing the discussion section of a systematic literature review paper, it's essential to focus on the following key points:
Significance of the findings: Begin by discussing the significance of your findings and highlighting their importance. Explain how your findings contribute to the existing knowledge in the field and how they can be applied in practice.
Implications of the findings: Discuss the implications of your findings for theory, policy, practice, and future research. Consider the limitations of your study and potential areas for future research.
Comparison with other studies: Besides comparing your findings with other similar and dissimilar studies, try to contextualize them with regard to the overall literature in the field. You can discuss how your findings confirm, extend, or contradict current knowledge in the field.
Methodological considerations: Discuss the strengths and limitations of your study's methodology, including any potential biases or sources of error. You can also discuss the overall quality of the literature you reviewed.
Conclusions: Conclude by summarizing the key findings and contributions of your study and discussing their implications for future research.
Remember, the discussion section is your chance to interpret and evaluate the results of your systematic literature review, so strive to provide a critical and insightful analysis of your findings. Avoid merely restating your results and instead, focus on adding value and contributing to the larger conversation in your field.
In the discussion section of your Systematic Literature Review (SLR) paper, you'll interpret and synthesize the reviewed studies to connect them with your own findings. Here's a simplified outline to help you write an effective discussion:
Recap Research Question/Objectives: Restate the main focus of your systematic literature review by summarizing the research question or objectives.
Summarize Key Findings: Provide a brief overview of the main findings, including the number of papers reviewed, types of studies, key themes, trends, and any significant gaps identified.
Compare and Contrast Previous Work: Discuss how your findings compare with previous systematic reviews or studies. Highlight similarities, differences, and explain possible reasons for any discrepancies.
Interpret Results: Analyze the implications of the collective evidence from the reviewed papers. Discuss overall trends and patterns observed in the literature, and explain conflicting findings based on study characteristics or methodologies.
Address Gaps and Limitations: Acknowledge limitations in your review and explain how they might have influenced the results. Highlight areas where the existing literature falls short and provide possible reasons for these gaps.
Assess Strength of Evidence: Evaluate the overall strength of evidence presented in the reviewed papers. Discuss study quality and consistency of findings, possibly categorizing evidence as strong, moderate, or weak.
Practical Implications: Discuss the practical implications of your findings for practitioners, policymakers, or researchers. Explain how your results can inform decision-making or guide future research directions.
Theoretical Contributions: If applicable, discuss any new theories, frameworks, or conceptual models identified through the synthesis of existing literature.
Recommendations for Future Research: Offer suggestions for future research based on identified gaps and limitations in the reviewed papers. Propose potential research directions to build upon existing evidence.
Conclusion: Summarize the main points discussed, emphasizing the importance of your systematic literature review and its contributions to the field.
Use clear and concise language, supported by evidence from the reviewed studies, to enhance the credibility of your discussion. Avoid introducing new information or data; focus on interpreting and synthesizing the existing literature.
- Badges
- Science topic