I am currently providing an intensive training course on PhD proposal writing for science students. I am thinking of creating a guide. I wondered if anyone had some advice.
The real problem is not in _writing_ the PhD proposal. The real difficulty is in learning what needs to go into the proposal, then working out how you can do original, significant research, which is scary. This implies initial reading, planning and prototyping.
The concern of the mentioned guide is expected to be very useful for young researchers. On of the key factors of the usefulness of the guide is the availability of flowcharts, and smart graphs instead of lengthy description. I would like to have a copy of that guide. Good luck
I think you'll have no problem in obtaining a lot of content from the internet. My advice is be selective in your choice and above all to make your guideline practice- oriented by incorporating as many tasks as possible which would make your candidates develop their skills easily.
Title and abstract: a student is expected to provide a preliminary title which will be further elaborated in the process of thesis writing. An abstract should usually be no longer than a page, and provide a brief summary of what you are going to cover in your research proposal.
Literature review: The literature review demonstrates the applicant’s knowledge of the main research achievements in the area of study. You should pay attention to providing some of the key references in your area of research which requires doing extensive research on your part.
Research problem, aim and objectives: As a result of your literature review, you should identify the main gap in your research area on which you are going to focus in your PhD project. Once the research problem is identified, you will be able to pose the main aim and objectives of your project.
You should dedicate some space to Research methodology, or, in other words, explaining how you are going to go about doing your research. This section also demonstrates your knowledge of the existing research methodologies in your area of study.
References: Do not forget to specify all the references at the end of the proposal.
In your exploration of content, please also make sure what makes a PhD dissertation different from other levels like masters. The difference is usually in rigour and outcome where at such level the contribution to new knowledge is highly emphasized
The cogent and practical suggestion made by colleagues are really helpful. However, it is very essential to add budgetary allocations as well as time/work plan for the research to research proposal write-ups.
The real problem is not in _writing_ the PhD proposal. The real difficulty is in learning what needs to go into the proposal, then working out how you can do original, significant research, which is scary. This implies initial reading, planning and prototyping.
It may be differ supervisor to supervisor what the elements s/he likes because the supervisor is the supreme authority to choose the elements to be included in the PhD Proposal and I think that why the question has been raised. Otherwise , many of the answers above can be reached in the destination.
This book could help to sharp the course content as it helps to move from topic to proposal stage. Ranjit Kumar (2014). Research methodology(4th ed). London, Thousands Oaks, New Delhi: Sage publications Ltd. ISBN 9781446269978. It covers the following topics: •Research as a way of thinking •Research as a process •Formulating research questions •From concept to variable •Choosing a research design •Types of data collection instruments •Sampling •Ethical issues in data collection.
I wish you the best with your proposal and if you need help please email me at [email protected]
a PhD propoal is the first three chapters of the disseratiion which is what you are going to do in your study
Chapter one is the Introduction, research questions, need for study, ratiionale of the study, purpose of the study, problem statement, short intro to methodology, summary of chapter
chapter 2 is the lit review which is a ciritical analysis exhausting the existing lit, critiquing the studies and research designs and resarch questuons, and finding the gap in the literature that your study can fill. Fi'rst is an intro, then how you conducted the litreview, databases used, key words used etc, and the n critique the literature by theme, at the end show the gap in lit and how your study fits in and a small ratioale for your research design and chapter summary
chapter 3 is the methodlogy, here is the intro to methodology, reasons or rationnnale for methodology, is quantiative, qualitative; or mixed lethods? Here mention research questions, research design, rationnale, why did not choose other designs, sample size, validity and reliability, summary of chaoter
Which I know in doctoral research projects in Iraq is required to include the research plan 4-5 topics or objectives to be accepted by the institution of higher education.
It's wonderful discussion panel and topic is also interesting to me. However, I think a PhD proposal must contain clearly the expected new knowledge to the society and nation or the way out of the specific problem of the society.
this chapter may me mentioned in the following head line -
" Expected knowledge addition / Expected way out of the identified and specific problem"
Possibly start by planning the program, and that is somewhat dependent on the field of study. I study insects. In Entomology it would be really good to get three manuscripts out of a Ph.D. program. If you can't get at least one, then something went very wrong.
So there should be three research questions developed something along the lines of what Khadeeja provided. I would make sure that one project was a sure thing. We know enough about this system (or a closely related system) that this project will work. I would include a project that is much more risky. It might need some refocusing, it will have problems, unexpected results, and might be a mess at the end. Innovative, cutting edge science is seldom a sure bet. Knowing how to work through, change direction, and refocus a project that at times seems riddled with insurmountable problems is a useful skill, but might involve some level of failure.
Be flexible. Sometimes a new faculty member is hired, or you take a class and you and the professor really connect. That might open a door to a related project that was not possible with the tools and skills of the people at the time the proposal was written.
If possible, try simulating the experiment. This will help make a better choice for planning sample sizes (replication). It will also help with experimental design and what to do with all the lovely data. If not simulated try projecting scenarios: I am interested in the number of infected individuals in the field. The next question might be about how your sampling strategy will change if initial data shows that 0.05% of individuals are infected, versus 50% versus 98% of individuals infected.
Carefully scan the literature, find the literature gap, formulate your research objectives, find a suitable research methodology which should not violate the basic rules and principles, and then write a brief summary including all the mentioned aspects having a good introduction section.
Good contribution by all. I appreciate regarding links, pdf books and other guidelines. Hope that this strong family connection will be more stronger for all.
I think what you are doing is an excellent thing. Please keep it open source & share freely. Please keep the Guide generic, so it can have wider audience.
The research proposal might be one of the first times you have to present something to a group of people in your field of study. It may be the first time you have to field questions with no bounds to the type of questions that are asked. You are either prepared or not, and no amount of cramming the night before will help.
The proposal is training for putting together a set of logical statements that result in some testable assumption(s). It is also a test of skill in experimental design. It is also the opportunity for committee members to address mistakes.
The following publications should also be helpful:
Baker, M. J. (2000) Writing a Research Proposal, The Marketing Review, 1, 1, pp. 61-78.
Faryadi, Q. (2012) How to write your PhD proposal: A step-by-step guide, American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2, 4, pp. 111-115.
Kilbourn, B. (2006) The Qualitative Dissertation Doctoral Proposal, Teachers College Record, 108, 4, pp. 529-576.
Kumar, R. (2011) Research Methodology - a step-by-step for beginners. 3rd edn. California: SAGE Publications Ltd.
van Ekelenburg, H. (2010) The art of writing good research proposals, Science Progress, 93, 4, pp. 429-442.
Vivar, C. G., McQueen, A., Whyte, D. A. and Armayor, N. C. (2007) Getting started with qualitative research: developing a research proposal, Nurse Researcher, 14, 3, pp. 60-74.
Exactly, that is what you got from my Research folder. But that is from the faculty of Arts Languages and Humanities. Engineering faculties may have a slightly different template