hello everyone

I'm writing scenarios with fsc26

however, I have trouble filling the sample sizes in tpl files

so far I just fill the sample sizes with *2 of my empirical sampling sizes (cause my focal species is diploid so pop0=181*2, pop1=24*2)

however, these sample sizes tremendously increase the computation time to almost 1 month (I'm using Linux with 10 cores for each model)

to save computation time, will the estimated parameters be strongly affected by the smaller sample sizes I give in my scenario (e.g., only use half the original sample sizes)?

thanks a lot!

below is one of my tpl and est files of an early migration model

//Parameters for the coalescence simulation program: fsimcoal2.exe

2 samples to simulate :

//Population effective sizes (number of genes)

NEW

NHC

//Samples sizes and samples age

362

48

//Growth rates: negative growth implies population expansion

0

0

//Number of migration matrices : 0 implies no migration between demes

3

//Migration matrix 0

0 0

0 0

//Migration matrix 1

0 MIG1

MIG2 0

//Migration matrix 2

0 0

0 0

//historical event: time, source, sink, migrants, new deme size, new growth rate, migration matrix index

2 historical event

TNOMIG 0 0 0 1 0 1

TDIV 1 0 1 RESIZE0 0 2

//Number of independent loci [chromosome]

1 0

//Per chromosome: Number of contiguous linkage Block: a block is a set of contiguous loci

1

//per Block:data type, number of loci, per generation recombination and mutation rates and optional parameters

FREQ 1 0 1.8e-9 OUTEXP

// Search ranges and rules file

// ****************************

[PARAMETERS]

//#isInt? #name #dist.#min #max

//all Ns are in number of haploid individuals

1 NEW logunif 10 1e7 output

1 NHC logunif 10 1e7 output

1 NANC logunif 10 1e7 output

0 MIG1 logunif 0.00001 1 output

0 MIG2 logunif 0.00001 1 output

1 TNOMIG logunif 10 1e5 output

1 TPLUS logunif 1 1e5 output

[RULES]

[COMPLEX PARAMETERS]

0 RESIZE0 = NANC/NEW hide

1 TDIV = TNOMIG+TPLUS output

by the way, this model will stuck sometime and I have to re-simulate the model, could I edit something in this scenario to avoid stuck? thanks for any suggestion!

More Pei-Wei Sun's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions