08 August 2014 2 285 Report

Everybody knows that EBSD already has a lot of problems which are related to drift phenomena. This becomes unpredictable at higher magnification which are typical in combination with FIB preparation. If already in 2D the predicted beam position is quite unreliable and can be several steps away from the assumed position, how reliable is a beam position in 3D which presupposes an ideal (constant) ablation rate of the FIB preparation? How accurate the crystallographic description of grain or phase boundaries can be?

More Gert Nolze's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions