My question is not about various made up "singularities" or the present *incremental* development of natural sciences. It is about the historically unprecedented, non-incremental, impact on science of the coming information processing paradigm in Nature (which is not to be confused with the present bogus AI).
Please could you expand on what you mean by super-transitory and why science is consider to be going through such a phase (by you, people in general)?
By "super-transitory" I mean historically unprecedented and absolutely radical, i.e. the basic language of science will change.
(For my opinion as to why, please see http://www.cs.unb.ca/~goldfarb/BOOK.pdf )
Antonio, please clarify yourself: I'm not sure what you are saying. Thanks.
Its difficult to believe but its true. In future we might face such question which will ultimately lead us to change our perception of past.
Like the nature of electrons which in past we believed is the smallest particle.
Although the basic argument will remain same as in that time reference we will seek to see future and again past will become obsolete because science will seek some new path to unravel new directions.
Antonio :
1. "I would like listen news from you."
I'm sorry, I'm still not sure which news you would like to hear about. It appears to me, though, that the hints you are looking for are in the above two chapters (see the link I provided above).
2. "I think (May be I am wrong) you are pointing to a paradigm that long ago started."
Let me try to answer this point. All people you mentioned pointed to the need for such a transition, but what has become clearer now is that, as Von Neumann suggested at the end of his "The computer and the brain", to accomplish this transition, we need to develop entirely new 'mathematics'. (I have proposed one idea in this direction.) So what I'm suggesting is that the unprecedented, super-transitory, nature of our scientific period is directly related to this change in the basic numeric language we have used for several millennia: from various numeric forms, as the main language of science, to new kinds of *structured* entities (structs).
Antonio, the simplest example I could think of I put in section 2.9 (p. 60) of http://www.cs.unb.ca/~goldfarb/BOOK.pdf .
I have just opened a new question devoted specifically to this issue https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_main_road_for_the_development_of_AI_and_its_various_subfields_pattern_recognition_data_mining_information_retrieval_etc
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biology